Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in Patients following Transurethral Resection of the Prostate
Authors:
- Ran KatzRKRan Katz
- Tomasz BorkowskiTBTomasz Borkowski
- Andras HoznekAHAndras Hoznek
- Laurent SalomonLSLaurent Salomon
- Matthew T. GettmanMGMatthew T. Gettman
- Clement Claude AbbouCAClement Claude Abbou
- 1 October 2006
- journal article
- Published by S. Karger AG in Urologia Internationalis
- Vol. 77 (3) , 216-221
Abstract
Objectives: Previous transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) was reported to impose difficulties during open radical prostatectomy. We describe our experience in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) following transurethral resection of the prostate. Patients and Methods: The series included 35 patients: 22 patients underwent transperitoneal LRP (tpLRP) and 13 underwent extraperitoneal LRP (epLRP). The minimal interval between TURP and laparoscopy was 3 months. Patients’ charts were reviewed for their preoperative characteristics, intraoperative difficulties and complications, and outcome. Results: Patients’ mean age was 67.5 ± 4.4 years. 12 patients were cT1a,b and 23 patients were cT1c/T2. Twenty-two patients underwent tpLRP and 13 underwent epLRP. No statistical difference was found between the preoperative characteristics and the pathological results of cT1a,b vs. T1c/cT2 patients, or tpLRP vs. epLRP patients. Thirty-three procedures were completed laparoscopically and 2 were converted to open surgery. Perioperative complications included two leaking anastomoses, prolonged lymph drainage in 1 case, atelectasis (n = 1) and duodenal ulcer (n = 1). Twelve positive margins were noted, half of them in pT2 tumors. The mean follow-up was 28.5 months. Twenty-five of 35 patients had more than 12 months of follow-up. Among them 19 patients were completely continent (76%) and 6 (24%), reported mild stress incontinence. Conclusions: Although LRP following TURP is sometimes more technically difficult, simple modifications in the operative strategy help facilitate surgery. LRP following TURP favorably compares to open radical prostatectomy after TURP and laparoscopy in non-TURP patients.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Evaluation of the Decreasing Incidence of Positive Surgical Margins in a Large Retropubic Prostatectomy SeriesJournal of Urology, 2004
- Positive Surgical Margins in Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: The Impact of Apical Dissection, Bladder Neck Remodeling and Nerve PreservationJournal of Urology, 2003
- Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Oncological Evaluation After 1,000 Cases at Montsouris InstituteJournal of Urology, 2003
- Assessment of surgical technique and perioperative morbidity associated with extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomyUrology, 2003
- Prospective patient-reported continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomyUrology, 2001
- Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: The Lessons LearnedJournal of Endourology, 2001
- Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical ProstatectomyEuropean Urology, 2001
- Laparoscopic Radical ProstatectomyEuropean Urology, 2001
- Laparoscopic Radical ProstatectomyEuropean Urology, 2001
- Morbidity of radical retropubic prostatectomy following previous prostate resectionJournal of Surgical Oncology, 1994