Integrating explanation and prediction in computational social science
Top Cited Papers
- 30 June 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature
- Vol. 595 (7866) , 181-188
Abstract
Computational social science is more than just large repositories of digital data and the computational methods needed to construct and analyse them. It also represents a convergence of different fields with different ways of thinking about and doing science. The goal of this Perspective is to provide some clarity around how these approaches differ from one another and to propose how they might be productively integrated. Towards this end we make two contributions. The first is a schema for thinking about research activities along two dimensions—the extent to which work is explanatory, focusing on identifying and estimating causal effects, and the degree of consideration given to testing predictions of outcomes—and how these two priorities can complement, rather than compete with, one another. Our second contribution is to advocate that computational social scientists devote more attention to combining prediction and explanation, which we call integrative modelling, and to outline some practical suggestions for realizing this goal.Keywords
This publication has 76 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predicting consumer behavior with Web searchProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2010
- To Explain or to Predict?Statistical Science, 2010
- Causal Mechanisms in the Social SciencesAnnual Review of Sociology, 2010
- The perils of policy by p-value: Predicting civil conflictsJournal of Peace Research, 2010
- Computational Social ScienceScience, 2009
- KDD Cup and workshop 2007ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 2007
- A twenty-first century scienceNature, 2007
- Computational thinkingCommunications of the ACM, 2006
- Why Most Published Research Findings Are FalsePLOS Medicine, 2005
- The earth is round (p < .05).American Psychologist, 1994