Robotic Surgery Is a Safe Treatment in Very Elderly Patients with Resectable Lung Cancer
Authors:
- Pierluigi NovellisPNPierluigi Novellis
- Riccardo Di FonzoRFRiccardo Di Fonzo
- Edoardo BottoniEBEdoardo Bottoni
- Veronica Maria GiudiciVGVeronica Maria Giudici
- Domenico PontilloDPDomenico Pontillo
- Piergiorgio MurianaPMPiergiorgio Muriana
- Elisa DieciEDElisa Dieci
- Roberto FerraraRFRoberto Ferrara
- Alessandra BulottaABAlessandra Bulotta
- Giuseppe MarulliGMGiuseppe Marulli
- Gianluca PerroniGianluca Perroni
- Giulia VeronesiGVGiulia Veronesi
Open Access
- 17 June 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 14 (12) , 4314
Abstract
Background: Lung cancer represents a significant health concern, particularly among the elderly population. With global life expectancy increasing, the number of very elderly patients is rising. Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) offers potential advantages over both traditional and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and safety of RATS in very elderly patients (VEP) diagnosed with lung cancer. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent major lung resections using RATS between 2015 and 2022 at two specialized centers. Patients were divided into very elderly patients (VEP, ≥80 years) and non-elderly patients (NEP, p = 0.16), but grade III complications were observed in 14.3% of VEP and 6.4% of NEP (p = 0.12), and grade IV complications were observed in 0% of VEP and 0.9% of NEP (p = not estimable). The mean hospital stay was 4 days in both groups (p = 0.99). Even after PSM (26 VEP vs. 71 NEP), complications, hospital stay, and 90-day mortality (3.9% in VEP, 0% in NEP) were similar. Multivariable analysis identified reduced FEV1 as a predictor of complications, while pathological stage I and lobectomy were associated with a decreased risk of complications, both before and after PSM. Conclusions: RATS is a safe and feasible option for selected very elderly patients with lung cancer, yielding outcomes comparable to younger patients.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus open and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery approaches for lobectomyInteractive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, 2018
- Robotic-Assisted Versus Thoracoscopic Lobectomy Outcomes From High-Volume Thoracic SurgeonsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2018
- Postoperative Outcome After Pulmonary Surgery for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Elderly PatientsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2018
- Immunosenescence and immunecheckpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer patients: Does age really matter?Cancer Treatment Reviews, 2017
- The affordability of minimally invasive procedures in major lung resection: a prospective studyInteractive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, 2017
- Prevalence of heart failure in the elderly and future projections: the AGES-Reykjavík studyScandinavian Cardiovascular Journal, 2017
- The Use of Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Lung Resection: A Comprehensive Systematic ReviewSeminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2016
- The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for Revision of the TNM Stage Groupings in the Forthcoming (Eighth) Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung CancerJournal of Thoracic Oncology, 2016
- Robotic lobectomy for non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Long-term oncologic resultsThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2012
- Initial consecutive experience of completely portal robotic pulmonary resection with 4 armsThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2011