Factors that influence cecal intubation rate during colonoscopy in deeply sedated patients
Authors:
- 7 June 2011
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Vol. 27 (1) , 76-80
Abstract
Background and Aim: The technical performance of colonoscopy performed in deeply sedated patients differs from that performed without sedation or under minimal to moderate sedation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the factors affecting cecal intubation during colonoscopy performed under deep sedation.Methods: A total of 5352 consecutive subjects who underwent a screening colonoscopy as part of a health check‐up between January 2008 and December 2008 at an academic hospital were reviewed. All endoscopies were performed with deep sedation using combination propofol or propofol alone. Data collected included characteristics of the patients (age, gender, body mass index, bowel habits, history of abdominal or pelvic surgery, quality of bowel preparation, and presence/absence of colonic diverticula) and characteristics of the colonoscopists (experience level, colonoscopy procedure volume, and instrument handling method). These factors were analyzed to evaluate their impact on cecal intubation rates.Results: The crude cecal intubation rate was 98% and the adjusted cecal intubation rate was 98.3%. The mean cecal intubation time was 5.6 ± 3.2 min. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that patient age greater than 60 years, constipation, poor colon preparation and a two‐person colonoscopy procedure were independently associated with lower cecal intubation rates.Conclusions: Colonoscopy performed under deep sedation by experienced colonoscopists results in high cecal intubation rates. Among the significant patient‐related predictors influencing the cecal intubation, the quality of the bowel preparation was the only modifiable factor. When performed by experienced hands, the one‐person method was associated with higher cecal intubation rates than the two‐person method.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does Level of Sedation Impact Detection of Advanced Neoplasia?Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2010
- Screening and Surveillance for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Adenomatous Polyps, 2008: A Joint Guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of RadiologyCA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2008
- Endoscopic Treatment of Colorectal Neoplasms: A Simple and Safe Procedure to Lower the Incidence of Colorectal CancersDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 2008
- Colonoscopy completion and complication rates in a community gastroenterology practiceGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2006
- Less patient discomfort by one-man colonoscopy examinationInternational Journal Of Clinical Practice, 2006
- ASGE guideline: colorectal cancer screening and surveillanceGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2006
- Colonoscopy: Practice variation among 69 hospital-based endoscopistsGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2003
- Why is colonoscopy more difficult in women?Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1996
- Analysis of length and surface area of each segment of the large intestine according to age, sex and physiqueSurgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 1992
- Total colonoscopy: is it always possible?Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1991