Continued cancer drug approvals in Japan and Europe after market withdrawal in the United States: A comparative study of accelerated approvals
Open Access
- 10 July 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Clinical and Translational Science
- Vol. 17 (7) , e13879
Abstract
Regulatory authorities must balance ensuring evidence of efficacy and safety of new drugs. Various regulatory pathways, such as the accelerated approval program in the United States (US), allow authorities to quickly approve drugs for severely ill patients by granting market authorization based on surrogate end points and pending confirmatory trials. In this cross‐sectional study, we considered 23 indications of cancer drugs that received accelerated approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) but were subsequently withdrawn as of April 2023. Our investigation extended to assessing the regulatory status of these accelerated approvals in the European Union (EU) and Japan, examining relevant regulatory documents and identifying factors contributing to the withdrawal in the United States. Comparing regions, we found that for 52% (12/23) and 30% (7/23) of withdrawn accelerated approvals in the United States, sponsors had also sought marketing authorization from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and Japan's Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA), respectively. As of the April 30, 2023 study cutoff date, 83% (10/12) of drug–indication pairs remained approved by the EMA, while the PMDA retained 100% (7/7). For these indications, the time from FDA withdrawal until the study cutoff date ranged from 0.23 years to 11.45 years for EMA approvals (median: 1.28 years) and 1.10 years to 11.45 years for PMDA approvals (median: 3.22 years). These findings highlight substantial regulatory discrepancies concerning cancer drugs with unconfirmed benefits. Addressing these discrepancies may involve requiring pharmaceutical companies to confirm clinical benefits using more robust end points and fostering international harmonization in regulators' assessment.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Postmarketing Modifications of Drug Labels for Cancer Drugs Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration Between 2006 and 2016 With and Without Supporting Randomized Controlled TrialsJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2018
- Safety related label changes for new drugs after approval in the US through expedited regulatory pathways: retrospective cohort studyBMJ, 2017
- Characteristics of Preapproval and Postapproval Studies for Drugs Granted Accelerated Approval by the US Food and Drug AdministrationJAMA, 2017
- Thirty Years of Orphan Drug Legislation and the Development of Drugs to Treat Rare Seizure Conditions: A Cross Sectional AnalysisPLOS ONE, 2016
- Matched analysis on orphan drug designations and approvals: cross regional analysis in the United States, the European Union, and JapanDrug Discovery Today, 2016
- Priority review drugs approved by the FDA and the EMA: time for international regulatory harmonization of pharmaceuticals?Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2015
- First-line gefitinib in Caucasian EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC patients: a phase-IV, open-label, single-arm studyBritish Journal of Cancer, 2013
- Differences in drug approval processes of 3 regulatory agencies: a case study of gemtuzumab ozogamicinInvestigational New Drugs, 2012
- Gefitinib or Carboplatin–Paclitaxel in Pulmonary AdenocarcinomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Multi-Institutional Randomized Phase II Trial of Gefitinib for Previously Treated Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003