Mitigating Representativeness Errors in Sparse Soil Moisture Observations Through Upscaling Constrained by Intra-Pixel Spatial Variability
Authors:
- Qicheng ZengQZQicheng Zeng
- Xiaodan WuXiaodan Wu
- Jianguang WenJWJianguang Wen
- Xingwen LinXingwen Lin
- Gaofei YinGaofei Yin
- Xiaojun LiXLXiaojun Li
- Yukun LiYLYukun Li
- Qing XiaoQXQing Xiao
Preprint
- 7 July 2026
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
The validation of soil moisture (SM) products has long been constrained by the point-to-pixel scale mismatch, limiting their utility for hydrological applications. In sparse in situ networks, single-site measurements lack sufficient representativeness at the pixel scale, and their direct use for validation inevitably introduces non-negligible representativeness errors. Existing upscaling approaches either rely on densely distributed observations, limiting their generalizability, or directly extrapolate machine-learning-based spatial estimates, which risks propagating model biases into validation metrics. To address this, we propose a single-site upscaling approach constrained by intra-pixel spatial variability. The core idea is to use spatial variability information to guide the estimation of upscaling conversion coefficients. Specifically, we integrate multi-source remote sensing auxiliary variables with automated machine learning (AutoML) to construct a high-resolution SM trend surface that characterizes intra-pixel spatial variations and quantifies site representativeness. We further design a progressive estimation strategy, from OLS to AOLS and SW-AOLS, to optimize the point-to-pixel conversion stepwise. Results show that upscaling performance is closely tied to site representativeness. SW-AOLS reduced median representativeness errors by approximately 57% and 64% for moderate- and low-representativeness sites, respectively. Validation across 24 SM products, including L/C/X-band, active-passive fusion, and reanalysis products, demonstrates that the upscaled single-site references closely approximate pixel-scale ground "truth" from dense networks. For moderate- and low-representativeness sites, the upscaling approach reduced validation errors by 72% and 89%, and uncertainty by 42% and 60%, respectively. Without requiring additional ground observations, this study enhances validation reliability under sparse conditions and supports more reliable SM information for hydrological applications.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Characterization of uncertainty in ground-based validation of soil moisture products: A case study of QLB-NET in the Tibetan PlateauJournal of Hydrology, 2026
- In-situ and triple collocation-based evaluations of Tianmu-1 global soil moisture productsRemote Sensing of Environment, 2025
- Comprehensive quality assessment of satellite- and model-based soil moisture products against the COSMOS network in GermanyRemote Sensing of Environment, 2023
- Upscaling soil moisture from point scale to field scale: Toward a general modelVadose Zone Journal, 2023
- Assessment of 24 soil moisture datasets using a new in situ network in the Shandian River Basin of ChinaRemote Sensing of Environment, 2022
- Multi-layer high-resolution soil moisture estimation using machine learning over the United StatesRemote Sensing of Environment, 2021
- A first assessment of satellite and reanalysis estimates of surface and root-zone soil moisture over the permafrost region of Qinghai-Tibet PlateauRemote Sensing of Environment, 2021
- Direct Comparison and Triple Collocation: Which Is More Reliable in the Validation of Coarse‐Scale Satellite Surface Albedo ProductsJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2019
- ESA CCI Soil Moisture for improved Earth system understanding: State-of-the art and future directionsRemote Sensing of Environment, 2017
- Estimating soil water‐holding capacities by linking the Food and Agriculture Organization Soil map of the world with global pedon databases and continuous pedotransfer functionsWater Resources Research, 2000