Evaluation of the bedside Quikread go® CRP test in the management of febrile infants at the emergency department
- 3 February 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 36 (7) , 1205-1211
Abstract
Recently C-reactive protein (CRP) point-of-care tests have been developed. We aimed to validate a bedside CRP test (QuikRead go® CRP), to compare it with the laboratory CRP (ARCHITECT c8000 Abbott, Germany) test in children with fever without source (FWS), and to evaluate the optimal CRP cut-off value to identify those patients at a high risk for serious bacterial infection (SBI). The CRP bedside test was prospectively performed in capillary blood samples concurrently with the laboratory CRP testing for 283 well-appearing infants aged 1 to 24 months with FWS attending the emergency department (ED) between May 2013 and August 2015. The mean difference between the laboratory CRP and the QuikRead go CRP values was 0.71 mg/L (p = 0.444). Pearson’s correlation coefficient between the CRPs was r = 0.929 (p < 0.001). SBI was diagnosed in 34 patients (12.0%). The area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve obtained was 0.87 (95%CI: 0.82–0.90) for an optimal CRP cut-off value of > 10 mg/L (sensitivity: 94.1%, specificity: 49.0%, positive predictive value: 20.1%, negative predictive value: 98.4%), as a predictor of SBI. Nearly 45% of the patients were at a low risk for SBI according to CRP value; thus, additional laboratory tests would have been hypothetically avoided. There was a very strong, positive correlation between the QuikRead go CRP test and laboratory CRP determination. The QuikRead go CRP test provides reliable results to rule out SBI. Its implementation at the ED would improve the management of infants with FWS.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Emergency Department Laboratory Evaluations of Fever Without Source in Children Aged 3 to 36 MonthsPediatrics, 2011
- Markers for bacterial infection in children with fever without sourceArchives of Disease in Childhood, 2011
- The Pediatric Assessment TrianglePediatric Emergency Care, 2010
- Validity of the quick-read C-reactive protein test in the prediction of bacterial pneumonia in the pediatric emergency departmentEuropean Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2008
- Strategies to Improve Flow in the Pediatric Emergency DepartmentPediatric Emergency Care, 2007
- The Quick-Read C-Reactive Protein Test for the Prediction of Bacterial Gastroenteritis in the Pediatric Emergency DepartmentPediatric Emergency Care, 2007
- A Randomized Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Point-of-Care Testing in Decreasing Length of Stay in a Pediatric Emergency DepartmentPediatric Emergency Care, 2007
- Duration of fever and markers of serious bacterial infection inyoung febrile childrenPediatrics International, 2007
- Evaluation of a quick test for C‐reactive protein in a pediatric emergency departmentScandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 2006
- C-reactive protein in early detection of bacteremic versus viral infections in immunocompetent and compromised childrenThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1988