GRADE guidance 36: updates to GRADE's approach to addressing inconsistency
Authors:
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 9 March 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 158, 70-83
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- High statistical heterogeneity is more frequent in meta-analysis of continuous than binary outcomesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2016
- Empirical evidence about inconsistency among studies in a pair‐wise meta‐analysisResearch Synthesis Methods, 2015
- Use of GRADE for assessment of evidence about prognosis: rating confidence in estimates of event rates in broad categories of patientsBMJ, 2015
- GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2013
- GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistencyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- Risk and Cumulative Risk of Stroke RecurrenceStroke, 2011
- Efficacy and Safety of Finasteride Therapy for Androgenetic AlopeciaArchives of Dermatology, 2010
- Undue reliance on I 2 in assessing heterogeneity may misleadBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2008
- Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for meta‐analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomesStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2002