Bicycling crash circumstances vary by route type: a cross-sectional analysis
Authors:
- Kay TeschkeKTKay Teschke
- Theresa FrendoTFTheresa Frendo
- Hui ShenHSHui Shen
- M Anne HarrisMHM Anne Harris
- Conor Co ReynoldsCRConor Co Reynolds
- Peter A CriptonPCPeter A Cripton
- Jeff BrubacherJBJeff Brubacher
- Michael D CusimanoMCMichael D Cusimano
- Steven M FriedmanSFSteven M Friedman
- Garth HunteGHGarth Hunte
- Melody MonroMMMelody Monro
- Lee VernichLVLee Vernich
Open Access
- 22 November 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Public Health
- Vol. 14 (1) , 1205
Abstract
Widely varying crash circumstances have been reported for bicycling injuries, likely because of differing bicycling populations and environments. We used data from the Bicyclists’ Injuries and the Cycling Environment Study in Vancouver and Toronto, Canada, to describe the crash circumstances of people injured while cycling for utilitarian and leisure purposes. We examined the association of crash circumstances with route type. Adult cyclists injured and treated in a hospital emergency department described their crash circumstances. These were classified into major categories (collision vs. fall, motor vehicle involved vs. not) and subcategories. The distribution of circumstances was tallied for each of 14 route types defined in an earlier analysis. Ratios of observed vs. expected were tallied for each circumstance and route type combination. Of 690 crashes, 683 could be characterized for this analysis. Most (74%) were collisions. Collisions included those with motor vehicles (34%), streetcar (tram) or train tracks (14%), other surface features (10%), infrastructure (10%), and pedestrians, cyclists, or animals (6%). The remainder of the crashes were falls (26%), many as a result of collision avoidance manoeuvres. Motor vehicles were involved directly or indirectly with 48% of crashes. Crash circumstances were distributed differently by route type, for example, collisions with motor vehicles, including “doorings”, were overrepresented on major streets with parked cars. Collisions involving streetcar tracks were overrepresented on major streets. Collisions involving infrastructure (curbs, posts, bollards, street furniture) were overrepresented on multiuse paths and bike paths. These data supplement our previous analyses of relative risks by route type by indicating the types of crashes that occur on each route type. This information can guide municipal engineers and planners towards improvements that would make cycling safer.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- The safety of urban cycle tracks: A review of the literatureAccident Analysis & Prevention, 2013
- Comparing the effects of infrastructure on bicycling injury at intersections and non-intersections using a case–crossover designInjury Prevention, 2013
- Exploring bikeability in a metropolitan setting: stimulating and hindering factors in commuting route environmentsBMC Public Health, 2012
- The injury epidemiology of cyclists based on a road trauma registryBMC Public Health, 2011
- The Bicyclists' Injuries and the Cycling Environment study: a protocol to tackle methodological issues facing studies of bicycling safetyInjury Prevention, 2011
- Injuries to pedal cyclists on New Zealand roads, 1988-2007BMC Public Health, 2010
- Route Preferences among Adults in the near Market for Bicycling: Findings of the Cycling in Cities StudyAmerican Journal of Health Promotion, 2010
- Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: An international reviewPreventive Medicine, 2010
- Effect of 20 mph traffic speed zones on road injuries in London, 1986-2006: controlled interrupted time series analysisBMJ, 2009
- The impact of transportation infrastructure on bicycling injuries and crashes: a review of the literatureEnvironmental Health, 2009