A Comparison of Laparoscopy and Laparotomy for the Management of Abdominal Trauma: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis
Authors:
- 28 August 2015
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in World Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 39 (12) , 2862-2871
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to systematically review and compare the perioperative outcomes of laparoscopy with laparotomy for abdominal trauma patients.Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis comparing the perioperative outcomes of laparoscopy with laparotomy for abdominal trauma patients. Clinical endpoints included length of hospital stay, operation time, amount of intraoperative blood loss, time to postoperative exhaust, time to regular diet, time to out of bed, duration of postoperative pain, postoperative complications, perioperative mortality rate, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, missed injuries, conversions to laparotomy, and cure rate.Results: Sixty‐four studies including 9058 patients with abdominal trauma were included. In these studies, laparoscopy was used as a screening, diagnostic, or therapeutic tool. Meta‐analysis showed significant reductions in the incidence of postoperative complications (relative risk [RR] [95 % confidence interval (CI)] 0.37 [0.29–0.46]), perioperative mortality rate (RR 0.64; 95 % CI 0.52–0.80), operation time (mean difference [MD] [95 % CI] −19.93 min [−34.43 to 5.43]), length of hospital stay (MD −5.15 days; 95 % CI −6.80 to 3.50), amount of intraoperative blood loss (MD −141.33 ml; 95 % CI −260.99 to 21.67), time to postoperative exhaust (MD −5.32 h; 95 % CI −8.60 to 2.05), time to regular diet (MD −3.46 h; 95 % CI −6.31 to 0.61), time to out of bed (MD −23.51 h; 95 % CI −24.85 to 22.16), duration of postoperative pain (MD −21.34 h; 95 % CI −22.65 to 20.03), length of ICU stay (MD −1.89 days; 95 % CI −4.05 to 0.27) in patients with abdominal trauma treated with laparoscopy compared with laparotomy. The pooled incidence of postoperative complications, missed injuries, conversions, and perioperative mortality rate of laparoscopy among the case reports were 0.04 (95 % CI 0.03–0.06), 0.01 (95 % CI 0.01–0.02), 0.24 (95 % CI 0.20–0.28), 0.01(95 % CI 0.01–0.02), respectively. Cure rate of laparoscopy ranged from 46 to 95 % and the pooled rate was 0.76 (95 % CI 0.71–0.81).Conclusions: Laparoscopy is an effective way to improve perioperative outcomes and reduce the complications of hemodynamically stable patients with abdominal trauma. It is worth further popularization in clinical practice.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Health Research Subproject from National Ministry of Health (201302016)
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trialsBMJ, 2011
- Standard Examination System for Laparoscopy in Penetrating Abdominal TraumaJournal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care, 2009
- The role of video-assisted laparoscopy in management of patients with small bowel injuries in abdominal traumaSurgical Endoscopy, 2008
- Laparoscopy Offers Diagnosis and Treatment in Abdominal Stab InjuriesSurgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 2007
- Laparoscopy versus laparotomy in management of abdominal traumaSurgical Endoscopy, 2007
- Laparoscopic repair of traumatic bowel injury in childrenJournal of Pediatric Surgery, 2006
- Diagnostic and therapeutic laparoscopy in pediatric abdominal traumaJournal of Pediatric Surgery, 2006
- The Contribution of Laparoscopy in Evaluation of Penetrating Abdominal WoundsJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2005
- Diagnostic and Therapeutic Laparoscopy for Penetrating Abdominal TraumaThe Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 1997
- Laparoscopy in 121 Consecutive Patients with Abdominal Gunshot WoundsThe Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 1995