Comparison of the Penman‐Monteith method and regional calibration of the Hargreaves equation for actual evapotranspiration using SWAT-simulated results in the Seolma-cheon basin, South Korea
Authors:
Open Access
- 2 February 2016
- journal article
- other
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Hydrological Sciences Journal
- Vol. 61 (4) , 793-800
Abstract
The Hargreaves method provides reference evapotranspiration (ETo) estimates when only air temperature data are available, although it requires previous local calibration for an acceptable performance. This method was evaluated using the data from 71 meteorological stations in the Seolma-cheon basin (8.48 km2), South Korea, comparing daily estimates against those from the Penman‐Monteith (PM) method, which was used as the standard. To estimate reference ETo more exactly, considering the climatological characteristics in South Korea, parameter regionalization of the Hargreaves equation is carried out. First, the modified Hargreaves equation is presented after an analysis of the relationship between solar radiation and temperature. Second, parameter (KET) optimization of the regional calibration of the Hargreaves equation (RCH) is performed using the PM method and the modified equation at 71 meteorological stations. Next, an application was carried out to evaluate the evapotranspiration methods (PM, original Hargreaves and RCH) in the SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) model by comparing these with the measured actual evapotranspiration (AET) in the basin. The SWAT model was calibrated using 3 years (2007–2009) of daily streamflow at the watershed outlet and 3 years (2007–2009) of daily AET measured at a mixed forest. The model was validated with 3 years (2010‐2012) of streamflow and AET. RCH will contribute to a better understanding of evapotranspiration of an ungauged watershed in areas where meteorological information is scarce.Keywords
Funding Information
- Korea Meterological Administration Research
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Technical Note: Assessing Climate Change Impact on Hydrological Components of a Small Forest Watershed through SWAT Calibration of Evapotranspiration and Soil MoistureTransactions of the ASABE, 2011
- Automatic Calibration of SWAT Model Using LH-OAT Sensitivity Analysis and SCE-UA Optimization MethodJournal of Korea Water Resources Association, 2006
- Impact of imperfect potential evapotranspiration knowledge on the efficiency and parameters of watershed modelsJournal of Hydrology, 2004
- Estimating Reference Evapotranspiration Under Inaccurate Data ConditionsIrrigation and Drainage Systems, 2002
- Evaluating the use of “goodness‐of‐fit” Measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validationWater Resources Research, 1999
- LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT1Jawra Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1998
- Estimating hydrologic budgets for three Illinois watershedsJournal of Hydrology, 1996
- Evapotranspiration Research Priorities for the Next Decade—IrrigationTransactions of the ASAE, 1988
- A Penman for All SeasonsJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 1986
- Reference Crop Evapotranspiration from TemperatureApplied Engineering in Agriculture, 1985