Efficacy and acceptability of different interventions for acrophobia: A network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
- 1 March 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Affective Disorders
- Vol. 282, 786-794
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Ministry of Education (ANHRF109-31)
- China Medical University Hospital
- Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
- China Medical University, Taiwan (CMU103-BC-4-1, CMU104-S-16-01, CMU108-SR-106, CRS-108-048, DMR-108-216, DMR-109-102, DMR-109-244, DMR-HCC-109-12, DMR-HHC-109-11)
- Tainan Municipal An-Nan Hospital
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATAPLOS ONE, 2013
- Cognitive processing and acrophobia: Validating the Heights Interpretation QuestionnaireJournal of Anxiety Disorders, 2011
- Glucocorticoids enhance extinction-based psychotherapyProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011
- Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorialJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- Psychological approaches in the treatment of specific phobias: A meta-analysisClinical Psychology Review, 2008
- Do Self-Statements Enhance the Effectiveness of Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy? A Comparative Evaluation in AcrophobiaCyberPsychology & Behavior, 2007
- Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisonsStatistics in Medicine, 2004
- Virtual reality treatment versus exposure in vivo: a comparative evaluation in acrophobiaBehaviour Research and Therapy, 2002
- Specific fears and phobiasThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1998
- The development of a scale to measure fearBehaviour Research and Therapy, 1965