Macrolide Resistance Among Invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates
Authors:
- Kathryn GayKGKathryn Gay
- David S. StephensDSDavid S. Stephens
- Duc J. VugiaDVDuc J. Vugia
- Margaret PassMPMargaret Pass
- Susan JohnsonSJSusan Johnson
- Nancy L. BarrettNBNancy L. Barrett
- William SchaffnerWSWilliam Schaffner
- Paul R. CieslakPCPaul R. Cieslak
- Peggy S. MaupinPMPeggy S. Maupin
- Elizabeth R. ZellEZElizabeth R. Zell
- James H. JorgensenJJJames H. Jorgensen
- 17 October 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 286 (15) , 1857-1862
Abstract
Research from JAMA — Macrolide Resistance Among Invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates — ContextMacrolide antibiotics, including erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin, are the mainstays of empirical pneumonia therapy. Macrolide resistance among Streptococcus pneumoniae, the most common cause of community-acquired pneumonia, is increasing in the United States. Whether resistance is a significant problem or whether macrolides remain useful for treatment of most resistant strains is unknown.ObjectiveTo examine the epidemiology of macrolide-resistant pneumococci in the United States.Design and SettingAnalysis of 15 481 invasive isolates from 1995 to 1999 collected by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Active Bacterial Core surveillance system in 8 states.Main Outcome MeasuresTrends in macrolide use (1993-1999) and resistance and factors associated with resistance, including examination of 2 subtypes, the M phenotype, associated with moderate minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), and the MLSB phenotype, associated with high MICs and clindamycin resistance.ResultsFrom 1993 to 1999, macrolide use increased 13%; macrolide use increased 320% among children younger than 5 years. Macrolide resistance increased from 10.6% in 1995 to 20.4% in 1999. M phenotype isolates increased from 7.4% to 16.5% (P<.001), while the proportion with the MLSB phenotype was stable (3%-4%). The median erythromycin MIC (MIC50) of M phenotype isolates increased from 4 µg/mL to 8 µg/mL. In 1999, M phenotype strains were more often from children than persons 5 years or older (25.2% vs 12.6%; P<.001) and from whites than blacks (19.3% vs 11.2%; P<.001).ConclusionsIn the setting of increasing macrolide use, pneumococcal resistance has become common. Most resistant strains have MICs in the range in which treatment failures have been reported. Further study and surveillance are critical to understanding the clinical implications of our findings.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Epidemiology of Invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae Infections in the United States, 1995-1998Opportunities for Prevention in the Conjugate Vaccine EraJAMA, 2001
- Two New Mechanisms of Macrolide Resistance in Clinical Strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae from Eastern Europe and North AmericaAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2000
- The Emergence ofStreptococcus pneumoniaeResistant to Macrolide Antimicrobial Agents: A 6‐Year Population‐Based AssessmentThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2000
- Practice Guidelines for the Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in AdultsClinical Infectious Diseases, 2000
- Macrolide resistance in Belgian Streptococcus pneumoniaeJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2000
- Nomenclature for Macrolide and Macrolide-Lincosamide-Streptogramin B Resistance DeterminantsAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1999
- Macrolide resistance mechanisms and expression of phenotypes among Streptococcus pneumoniae circulating in ItalyJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1999
- Pneumococcal macrolide resistance—myth or reality?Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1999
- Prevalence and Characterization of the Mechanisms of Macrolide, Lincosamide, and Streptogramin Resistance in Isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniaeAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1998
- Inducible resistance to macrolides, lincosamides and streptogramin type B antibiotics: The resistance phenotype, its biological diversity, and structural elements that regulate expression - A reviewJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1985