Neo-Liberal Individualism or Self-Directed Support: Are We All Speaking the Same Language on Modernising Adult Social Care?
- 1 July 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Social Policy and Society
- Vol. 8 (3) , 333-345
Abstract
This article explores recent developments in the modernisation of adult social care through the lens of changes to English day services. Drawing on wider policy debates, it argues that Disabled Peoples' Movement and governmental ideas on self-directed support, although superficially similar, are growing increasingly apart. It is argued that in the absence of adequate funding and exposure to organisations of disabled people, day service recipients risk moving from a position of enforced collectivism to an enforced individualism characteristic of neo-liberal constructions of economic life.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- ‘Talking about us without us?’. A response to Neil CrowtherDisability & Society, 2008
- The ethics of welfare-to-workPolicy & Politics, 2007
- The Development of Direct Payments in the UK: Implications for Social JusticeSocial Policy and Society, 2005
- Direct payments and the social model of disabilitySocial Work and Social Sciences Review, 2005
- Do disabled people need social workers?Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 2004
- Social work and direct payments2002
- Disability, Dependency and the New Deal for Disabled PeopleDisability & Society, 2000
- The Inclusive Society?1998
- The Politics of Disablement1990
- An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations1776