Who Are Those Guys? Constructing the Oilfield’s New Dominant Masculinity
- 14 August 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Men and Masculinities
- Vol. 17 (4) , 396-416
Abstract
Slippages between dominant-nonhegemonic masculinities and hegemonic masculinities obscure and confuse the importance of these masculinities for understanding the hierarchal gender order. This article uses in-depth interviews ( N = 22) with oilfield workers, and observations at drilling sites to clarify how men can construct a socially dominant-nonhegemonic masculinity and subordinate a previously hegemonic masculinity. This study shows how a recursive relationship between industry and organizational safety policies enable men to construct a new dominant masculinity predicated on safety at work, while socially dominant men remain complicit with hegemonic masculinity in the domestic sphere. The discussion underscores the importance of distinguishing between dominant-nonhegemonic and hegemonic masculinities, which promotes our understanding of the hierarchal relationship among masculinities, femininities, and the struggle for gender dominance.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rethinking Hegemonic Masculinity in a Globalizing WorldMen and Masculinities, 2008
- Making our Way through the World2007
- Subjective and Objective Measures of Adaptation and Readaptation to Night Work on an Oil Rig in the North SeaSLEEP, 2006
- Undoing Gender2004
- Three Visions of Masculine Success on American FarmsMen and Masculinities, 2004
- The Glass Phallus: Pub(lic) Masculinity and Drinking in Rural New Zealand*Rural Sociology, 2000
- From lumberjack to business manager: masculinity in the Norwegian forestry pressJournal of Rural Studies, 2000
- THE EPISTEMOLOGY OF THE GENDERED ORGANIZATIONGender & Society, 2000
- The Organizational Construction of Hegemonic Masculinity: The Case of the US NavyGender, Work & Organization, 1996
- Rural masculinity in transition: Gender images in tractor advertisementsJournal of Rural Studies, 1995