Search strategies and evaluation in protein–protein docking: principles, advances and challenges
- 1 August 2014
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Drug Discovery Today
- Vol. 19 (8) , 1081-1096
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 164 references indexed in Scilit:
- A structure‐based benchmark for protein–protein binding affinityProtein Science, 2011
- Achieving reliability and high accuracy in automated protein docking: Cluspro, PIPER, SDU, and stability analysis in CAPRI rounds 13–19Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 2010
- Protein–protein docking benchmark version 4.0Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 2010
- MDockPP: A hierarchical approach for protein‐protein docking and its application to CAPRI rounds 15–19Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 2010
- An integrated suite of fast docking algorithmsProteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 2010
- PIE—Efficient filters and coarse grained potentials for unbound protein–protein dockingProteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 2009
- Principles of flexible protein–protein dockingProteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 2008
- Protein–protein docking benchmark version 3.0Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 2008
- Discrimination of near‐native structures in protein–protein docking by testing the stability of local minimaProteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 2008
- A simple reference state makes a significant improvement in near‐native selections from structurally refined docking decoysProteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 2007