Atrial Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation as a Distinct Pathophysiological and Clinical Entity: No Idiopathic Tricuspid Regurgitation Anymore
Authors:
- Diana R. FlorescuDFDiana R. Florescu
- Denisa MuraruDMDenisa Muraru
- Valentina VolpatoVVValentina Volpato
- Mara GavazzoniMGMara Gavazzoni
- Sergio CaravitaSCSergio Caravita
- Michele TomaselliMTMichele Tomaselli
- Pellegrino CiampiPCPellegrino Ciampi
- Cristina FlorescuCFCristina Florescu
- Tudor A. BălșeanuTBTudor A. Bălșeanu
- Gianfranco ParatiGPGianfranco Parati
- Luigi P. BadanoLBLuigi P. Badano
Open Access
- 13 January 2022
- journal article
- review article
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 11 (2) , 382
Abstract
Functional tricuspid regurgitation (FTR) is a strong and independent predictor of patient morbidity and mortality if left untreated. The development of transcatheter procedures to either repair or replace the tricuspid valve (TV) has fueled the interest in the pathophysiology, severity assessment, and clinical consequences of FTR. FTR has been considered to be secondary to tricuspid annulus (TA) dilation and leaflet tethering, associated to right ventricular (RV) dilation and/or dysfunction (the “classical”, ventricular form of FTR, V-FTR) for a long time. Atrial FTR (A-FTR) has recently emerged as a distinct pathophysiological entity. A-FTR typically occurs in patients with persistent/permanent atrial fibrillation, in whom an imbalance between the TA and leaflet areas results in leaflets malcoaptation, associated with the dilation and loss of the sphincter-like function of the TA, due to right atrium enlargement and dysfunction. According to its distinct pathophysiology, A-FTR poses different needs of clinical management, and the various interventional treatment options will likely have different outcomes than in V-FTR patients. This review aims to provide an insight into the anatomy of the TV, and the distinct pathophysiology of A-FTR, which are key concepts to understanding the objectives of therapy, the choice of transcatheter TV interventions, and to properly use pre-, intra-, and post-procedural imaging.Keywords
This publication has 104 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessment of functional tricuspid regurgitation using 320-detector-row multislice computed tomography: Risk factor analysis for recurrent regurgitation after tricuspid annuloplastyThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2014
- Right Atrial Indexed Volume in Healthy Adult Population: Reference Values for Two‐Dimensional and Three‐Dimensional Echocardiographic MeasurementsEchocardiography, 2013
- Assessment of functional tricuspid regurgitationEuropean Heart Journal, 2013
- Predictors for the Development of Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation with Anatomically Normal Valve in Patients with Atrial FibrillationEchocardiography, 2011
- Evaluation of Tricuspid Valve Morphology and Function by Transthoracic Three-Dimensional EchocardiographyCurrent Cardiology Reports, 2011
- Flow measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a multi-centre multi-vendor study of background phase offset errors that can compromise the accuracy of derived regurgitant or shunt flow measurementsJournal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2010
- Assessment of normal tricuspid valve anatomy in adults by real-time three-dimensional echocardiographyThe International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2007
- Geometric Determinants of Functional Tricuspid RegurgitationCirculation, 2006
- Three-Dimensional Geometry of the Tricuspid Annulus in Healthy Subjects and in Patients With Functional Tricuspid RegurgitationCirculation, 2006
- Impact of tricuspid regurgitation on long-term survivalJACC, 2004