Surgical intensive care unit clinician estimates of the adequacy of communication regarding patient prognosis
Open Access
- 29 November 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Critical Care
- Vol. 14 (6) , R218
Abstract
Introduction: Intensive care unit (ICU) patients and family members repeatedly note accurate and timely communication from health care providers to be crucial to high-quality ICU care. Practice guidelines recommend improving communication. However, few data, particularly in surgical ICUs, exist on health care provider opinions regarding whether communication is effective. Methods: To evaluate ICU clinician perceptions regarding adequacy of communication regarding prognosis, we developed a survey and administered it to a cross section of surgical ICU nurses, surgical ICU physicians, nurse practitioners (NPs), and surgeons. Results: Surgeons had a high satisfaction with communication regarding prognosis for themselves (90%), ICU nurses (85%), and ICU physicians and NPs (85%). ICU nurses noted high satisfaction with personal (82%) and ICU physician and NP (71%) communication, but low (2%) satisfaction with that provided by surgeons. ICU physicians and NPs noted high satisfaction with personal (74%) and ICU nurse (88%) communication, but lower (23%) satisfaction with that provided by surgeons. ICU nurses were the most likely (75%) to report speaking to patients and patient families regarding prognosis, followed by surgeons (40%), and then ICU physicians and NPs (33%). Surgeons noted many opportunities to speak to ICU nurses and ICU physicians and NPs about patient prognosis and noted that comments were often valued. ICU physicians and NPs and ICU nurses noted many opportunities to speak to each other but fewer opportunities to communicate with surgeons. ICU physicians and NPs thought that their comments were valued by ICU nurses but less valued by surgeons. ICU nurses thought that their comments were less valued by ICU physicians and NPs and surgeons. Conclusions: ICU nurses, surgeons, and ICU intensivists and NPs varied widely in their satisfaction with communication relating to prognosis. Clinician groups also varied in whether they thought that they had opportunities to communicate prognosis and whether their concerns were valued by other provider groups. These results hint at the nuanced and complicated relationships present in surgical ICUs. Further validation studies and further evaluations of patient and family member perspectives are needed.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- “It’s not just what the doctor tells me:” Factors that influence surrogate decision-makers’ perceptions of prognosis*Critical Care Medicine, 2010
- End-of-Life Decision Making in the Intensive Care Unit: Physician and Nurse PerspectivesAmerican Journal of Medical Quality, 2009
- Nurse-Physician Relationships in Hospitals: 20 000 Nurses Tell Their StoryCritical Care Nurse, 2009
- Surrogate Decision-Makers' Perspectives on Discussing Prognosis in the Face of UncertaintyAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2009
- The Language of Prognostication in Intensive Care UnitsMedical Decision Making, 2008
- Nurse-physician perspectives on the care of dying patients in intensive care units: Collaboration, moral distress, and ethical climate*Critical Care Medicine, 2007
- Clinical practice guidelines for support of the family in the patient-centered intensive care unit: American College of Critical Care Medicine Task Force 2004–2005Critical Care Medicine, 2007
- Nursing management and organizational ethics in the intensive care unitCritical Care Medicine, 2007
- Patient-safety and quality initiatives in the intensive-care unitCurrent Opinion in Anaesthesiology, 2006
- Who Should Manage the Dying Patient?: Rescue, Shame, and the Surgical ICU Dilemma1Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2002