Accuracy and reliability of transanal ultrasound for anterior anal sphincter injury
Authors:
- Douglas W. WongDWDouglas W. Wong
- Garnet J. BlatchfordGBGarnet J. Blatchford
- 1 August 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Vol. 41 (8) , 1000-1004
Abstract
Nal sphincter injury. METHODS: Sixty-two women underwent transanal ultrasound with hard-copy images obtained at 0.5-cm intervals from the anal verge to 2.5 cm into the anal canal. All transanal ultrasound procedures were also recorded on videotape. Two experienced ultrasonographers blinded as to the patients' clinical history and examination independently reviewed the images and videotape recordings for the presence or absence of anal sphincter injury. RESULTS: The accuracy of transanal ultrasound in 22 incontinent women with known anal sphincter injury was 100 percent. The accuracy of transanal ultrasound in 20 nulliparous women with intact anal sphincters was only 35 percent but improved to 50 percent after the “real time” videotape was reviewed (P=0.16) and further improved to 85 percent when interpretation was limited to the distal 1.5 cm of the anal canal (P=0.004). In these nulliparous women, intact internal sphincters were more accurately predicted than intact external sphincters (95 vs. 85 percent; P=0.24). Measurement agreement between the two ultrasonographers was 68 percent (fair; kappa, 0.26) but significantly improved to 78 percent (moderate; kappa, 0.48; P=0.0001) when interpretation was limited to the distal 1.5 cm of the anal canal. Overall clinical agreement (final scan interpretation) was good (81 percent agreement; kappa, 0.61). Agreement was better for the internal sphincter (74 percent; fair; kappa, 0.36) than the external sphincter (61 percent; poor; kappa, 0.17; P=0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Although transanal ultrasound can accurately identify anterior anal sphincter injury when present, transanal ultrasound falsely identifies sphincter injury in at least 5 to 25 percent of normal anal sphincters. Only fair agreement in the interpretation of transanal ultrasound exists between experienced ultrasonographers. Both the accuracy and reliability of transanal ultrasound are significantly improved by limiting transanal ultrasound to the distal 1.5 cm of the anal canal. Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, June 22 to 26, 1997. © The ASCRS 1998...Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Anal endosonography in healthy subjects and patients with idiopathic fecal incontinenceDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1994
- Anal endosonography and correlation with in vitro and in vivo anatomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1993
- Anal endosonographyDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1992
- Anal Sphincter Size Measured by Endosonography in Healthy VolunteersActa Radiologica, 1992
- Endoluminal ultrasound defines anatomy of the anal canal and pelvic floorDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1992
- Confirmation of endosonographic detection of external anal sphincter defects by simultaneous electromyographic mappingBritish Journal of Surgery, 1991
- Anal endosonography in the investigation of faecal incontinenceBritish Journal of Surgery, 1991
- Endosonographic variations in the normal internal anal sphincterInternational Journal of Colorectal Disease, 1991
- A comparison between electromyography and anal endosonography in mapping external anal sphincter defectsDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1990
- Anal endosonography: Technique and normal anatomyGastrointestinal Radiology, 1989