Long‐Term Follow‐up of Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy in the Intensive Care Unit
Open Access
- 12 February 2025
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in The Laryngoscope
- Vol. 135 (7) , 2306-2313
Abstract
Objective: The primary objective was to analyze percutaneous dilatation tracheostomy (PDT) management in the intensive care unit (ICU) by comparison with surgical tracheostomy (ST) outside of the ICU, with respect to: (i) long‐term postoperative outcomes, including rate of follow‐up, return to the emergency department, and major and minor complications; (ii) timing of decannulation, including time to decannulation, decannulation after >30 days, and decannulation at discharge. The secondary objective was to compare perioperative outcomes, including major and minor complications. Methods: A retrospective study from April 2013 to 2024 at a tertiary referral center. Eligible patients included those over 18 years old without PDT contraindications who received PDT in the ICU or ST. Results: Final analysis included 250 patients (125 [50%] PDT; 125 [50%] ST). The mean (SD) age of patients was 60.05 (16.41) years, and 85 (34.0%) were female. Compared with the ST group, the PDT group experienced significantly decreased long‐term follow‐up (41 [39.8%] vs. 115 [95.0%], respectively, p < 0.001), increased emergency department returns (61 [64.2%] vs. 31 [26.1%], p < 0.001), longer time to decannulation (estimated median difference: 11.00 days [95% CI: 7.00 to 15.00, p < 0.001]), increased decannulation after >30 days (23 [34.8%] vs. 13 [12.7%], p < 0.001), and similar postoperative complications (8 [8.4%] vs. 8 [6.8%], p = 0.664). The PDT group experienced significantly more perioperative complications (37 [30.1%] vs. 22 [17.6%], p = 0.021). Conclusion: The decreased long‐term follow‐up, delayed decannulation, and increased complications after PDT highlight potential pitfalls in ICU tracheostomy management, demonstrating the need for refined protocols, appropriate consultant involvement, and improved patient selection. Level of Evidence: 3 Laryngoscope , 135:2306–2313, 2025Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is Percutaneous Tracheostomy Safe?The Laryngoscope, 2022
- Association of Early vs Late Tracheostomy Placement With Pneumonia and Ventilator Days in Critically Ill PatientsJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 2021
- Open versus percutaneous tracheostomy in COVID-19: a multicentre comparison and recommendation for future resource utilisationEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2021
- Short- and long-term complications of surgical and percutaneous dilatation tracheotomies: a large single-centre retrospective cohort studyEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2019
- Percutaneous versus surgical strategy for tracheostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative and postoperative complicationsLangenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2017
- Complication rates of open surgical versus percutaneous tracheostomy in critically ill patientsThe Laryngoscope, 2016
- The Role of Cricothyrotomy, Tracheostomy, and Percutaneous Tracheostomy in Airway ManagementAnesthesiology Clinics, 2015
- Percutaneous dilational and surgical tracheostomy in burn patients: Incidence of complications and dysphagiaBurns, 2014
- I COUGHJAMA Surgery, 2013
- Bedside percutaneous dilational tracheostomy with endoscopic guidance: Experience with 71 ICU patientsIntensive Care Medicine, 1994