Comparing outcomes following open, hybrid, minimally invasive, and robotic-assisted esophagectomy: A systematic review

This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:

• Comparison of robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: A propensity-matched study from a single high-volume institution
  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2022
• Five-Year Survival Outcomes of Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in Esophageal Cancer
  JAMA Surgery, 2021
• Morbidity in open versus minimally invasive hybrid esophagectomy (MIOMIE)
  European Surgery, 2018
• Quality of Life and Late Complications After Minimally Invasive Compared to Open Esophagectomy: Results of a Randomized Trial
  World Journal of Surgery, 2015
• Comparison of Ivor-Lewis vs Sweet Esophagectomy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
  JAMA Surgery, 2015
• A comparative study of the therapeutic effect in two protocols: video-assisted thoracic surgery combined with laparoscopy versus right open transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer management
  The Chinese-German Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2013
• Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial
  The Lancet, 2012
• A prospective randomized comparison of transhiatal and transthoracic resection for lower-third esophageal carcinoma
  The American Journal of Surgery, 1997
• Surgical therapy of esophageal carcinoma: the influence of surgical approach and esophageal resection on cardiopulmonary function
  European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 1997
• Oesophagectomy by a transhiatal approach or thoracotomy: A prospective randomized trial
  British Journal of Surgery, 1993