Predictors of sinus rhythm restoration during radiofrequency ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation
Open Access
- 13 June 2026
- journal article
- Published by Institute of Cardio Technics - INCART in Journal of Arrhythmology
- Vol. 33 (2) , 5-13
Abstract
Aim . To identify predictors of sinus rhythm restoration during radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods . The study included 51 patients with persistent AF who underwent primary RFA. All patients underwent left atrial (LA) voltage mapping. The percentage of low-voltage areas (LVA%) was calculated, with a low-voltage threshold 0.5 mV. After pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), if AF persist, posterior wall isolation and mitral isthmus ablation were performed. In cases of persistent AF, LA electrophysiological mapping was performed using a multielectrode catheter to identify areas of fractionated signals and local re-entry, followed by ablation of these areas. If AF transformed into atrial flutter, activation mapping was performed to verify the arrhythmia mechanism and ablate the critical isthmus. If the AF rhythm persisted, electrical cardioversion was performed. Results . Sinus rhythm was restored during RFA in 29 patients (56.8%) and by electrical cardioversion in 22 patients (43.2%). Statistically significant differences between rhythm restoration types were found in AF duration (p=0.013; AUC=0.705) and LA appendage flow velocity (p=0.021; AUC=0.697). Patients who achieved rhythm restoration at the PVI stage had significantly smaller LA volume (p=0.004; AUC=0.796) and LVA% (p=0.002; AUC=0.792). In the group of patients in whom AF was eliminated by direct restoration to sinus rhythm during RFA, LVA% was significantly lower (p=0.039; AUC=0.738) compared with those in whom AF was eliminated via transformation into atrial flutter. Conclusions . AF duration and LA appendage flow velocity are predictors of rhythm restoration during RFA. Among patients who achieved sinus rhythm restoration during ablation, those who converted at the PVI stage had smaller LA volume and LVA%. An LVA% greater than 28.5% was identified as a predictor of AF transformation into atypical atrial flutter during RFA of persistent AF.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- 2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillationHeart Rhythm, 2024
- Association between left atrial low-voltage area and induction and recurrence of macroreentrant atrial tachycardia in pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillationJournal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2024
- Spatial and temporal relationship between focal and rotational activations and their relationship to structural remodeling in patients with persistent atrial fibrillationHeart Rhythm, 2024
- Specific Electrogram Characteristics Identify the Extra-Pulmonary Vein Arrhythmogenic Sources of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation – Characterization of the Arrhythmogenic Electrogram Patterns During Atrial Fibrillation and Sinus RhythmScientific Reports, 2020
- Characteristics and long-term catheter ablation outcome in long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation patients with non-pulmonary vein triggersInternational Journal of Cardiology, 2017
- Impact of baseline atrial fibrillation cycle length on acute and long-term outcome of persistent atrial fibrillation ablationJournal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2014
- Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation Termination and Clinical Success of Catheter Ablation of Persistent Atrial FibrillationThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2012
- Atrial fibrillation termination as a procedural endpoint during ablation in long-standing persistent atrial fibrillationHeart Rhythm, 2010
- Clinical Predictors of Termination and Clinical Outcome of Catheter Ablation for Persistent Atrial FibrillationJACC, 2009
- Left atrial appendage blood velocity and thromboembolic risk in patients with atrial fibrillationJACC, 1994