Symbolic Politics or Rational Choice? Testing Theories of Extreme Ethnic Violence
Author:
- 1 April 2006
- journal article
- Published by MIT Press in International Security
- Vol. 30 (4) , 45-86
Abstract
Rational choice theories claim that extreme ethnic violence (war and genocide) can be explained either as the result of information failures and commitment problems or as the utility-maximizing strategy of predatory elites. Symbolic politics theory asserts that such violence is driven by hostile ethnic myths and an emotionally driven symbolic politics based on those myths that popularizes predatory policies. Tests of these models in the cases of Sudan's civil war and Rwanda's genocide show that the rationalist models are incorrect: neither case can be understood as resulting from information failures, commitment problems, or rational power-conserving elite strategies. Rather, in both cases ethnic mythologies and fears made predatory policies so popular that leaders had little choice but to embrace them by playing up associated ethnic symbols, even though these policies led to the leaders' downfalls. Ethnic security dilemmas in such cases are driven not by uncertainty but by predatory leaders engaged in symbolic politics.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Psychocultural Interpretations and Dramas: Identity Dynamics in Ethnic ConflictPolitical Psychology, 2001
- The Myth of Ethnic Warfare: Understanding Conflict in the Post-Cold War WorldForeign Affairs, 2001
- The Passion of World Politics: Propositions on Emotion and Emotional RelationshipsInternational Security, 2000
- Violence and the Social Construction of Ethnic IdentityInternational Organization, 2000
- The Critical Barrier to Civil War SettlementInternational Organization, 1997
- Containing Fear: The Origins and Management of Ethnic ConflictInternational Security, 1996
- Rationalist explanations for warInternational Organization, 1995
- RECONCILIATION AS A PEACE‐BUILDING PROCESS IN POSTWAR EUROPEPeace & Change, 1994
- Political Consequences of Military Strategy: Expanding and Refining the Spiral and Deterrence ModelsWorld Politics, 1992
- The interplay of affect and cognition in attitude formation and change.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1990