The Future of the Orthopaedic Clinician-Scientist
Authors:
- Jaimo AhnJAJaimo Ahn
- Derek J DoneganDDDerek J Donegan
- J. Todd R LawrenceJLJ. Todd R Lawrence
- Scott D HalpernSHScott D Halpern
- Samir MehtaSMSamir Mehta
- 1 April 2010
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
- Vol. 92 (4) , 1041-1046
Abstract
Esearch and the opinions of academic chairs who must support them. Methods: Residents from sixteen departments were surveyed with a twenty-four-question online survey. Similar surveys were sent to chairs of all residency-sponsoring departments. Results: The response rate was 44% (183) for the residents and 60% (eighty-six) for the chairs. Forty-two percent of the residents felt certain or likely that they would perform research during their careers, and 28% were undecided. Ninety-nine percent thought that orthopaedic surgeons performing research is important to clinical orthopaedics. Ninety-three percent of the residents expressed the need for monetary incentives for research, but only 40% would help to provide it. Chairs similarly noted the importance of research subsidization (92%) and a willingness to support it (70%). Residents indicated that increased funding and protected time would provide the greatest incentives for research during residency; chairs agreed. After training, debt relief and salary support were most important for residents; chairs chose protected time and a chair who is supportive of research as most important. Primary authorship on a prior manuscript and past research experience were found to be associated with greater future research interest in univariate analyses; primary authorship maintained an independent association in multivariate analysis. Younger residents and women were more likely to be unsure of their research interest. Conclusions: Many orthopaedic residents in training have interest in integrating research into their future practice and support the research mission of orthopaedic surgeons. Our results may aid in identifying residents with high research interest (and those unsure) and help to guide the provision of incentives to actuate those interests. Clinical Relevance: Increasing the future research potential of residents will help to spur scientific investigation, which serves as the foundation for evidence-based clinical orthopaedic care....Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Educating Future Leaders of Medical Research: Analysis of Student Opinions and Goals from the MD???PhD SAGE (Students??? Attitudes, Goals, and Education) SurveyAcademic Medicine, 2007
- Institutional Barriers to the Orthopaedic Clinician-ScientistClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2006
- The Environment of the Successful Clinician-ScientistClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2006
- Funding the Mandate for the Orthopaedic Clinician ScientistClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2006
- The contribution of MD–PhD training to academic orthopaedic facultiesJournal of Orthopaedic Research, 2001
- Letters to the editorsJournal of Orthopaedic Research, 1999
- The orthopaedic surgeon scientist: An endangered species?Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 1999
- Factors Influencing the Pursuit of Careers in Academic Medicine: A Survey of MD-PhD Residents in Dermatology Programs in the United StatesJournal of Investigative Dermatology, 1992
- The physician scientist: an endangered but far from extinct species.BMJ, 1991
- The Clinical Investigator as an Endangered SpeciesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979