Altered Fecal Microbiota Signatures in Patients With Anxiety and Depression in the Gastrointestinal Cancer Screening: A Case-Control Study
Authors:
Open Access
- 8 November 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Psychiatry
- Vol. 12
Abstract
Background: Increasing attention has been devoted to cancer screening and microbiota in recent decades, but currently there is less focus on microbiota characterization among screeners and its relationship to anxiety and depression.Methods: We characterized the microbial communities of fecal samples collected through the FOBT card from anxiety and depression screeners and paired controls in Henan, China (1:2, N = 69). DNA was extracted using the MOBIO PowerSoil kit. The V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was sequenced using MiniSeq and processed using QIIME1. LEfSe was used to identify differentially abundant microbes, the Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to test alpha diversity differences, and permutational multivariate analysis of variance was used to test for differences in beta diversity.Results: Similar fecal microbiota signatures in composition were found among screeners. The intestinal microbial environments by phylum were all composed primarily of Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria, and the corresponding top genera were Faecalibacterium, Roseburia, and Prevotella. Compared with controls, the ranking of the top five genera in the anxiety and depression group changed, and the dominant genus was Prevotella in the anxiety and depression group and Faecalibacterium in the control group. There was a lower relative abundance of Gemmiger (1.4 vs. 2.3%, P = 0.025), Ruminococcus (0.6 vs. 0.8%, P = 0.037), and Veillonella (0.6 vs. 1.3%, P = 0.020). This may be linked to the lower alpha diversity in participants with anxiety and depression (Observed OTUs: 122.35 vs. 143.24; Chao1: 127.35 vs. 149.98), although no significant differences were observed. Distinct clustering in microbial composition between the two groups was detected for the Jaccard distance (P = 0.011).Conclusions: Our study showed differing microbial characterization among participants with anxiety and depression in the endoscopic screening of upper gastrointestinal cancer. Gemmiger, Ruminococcus, and Veillonella were informative and have potential clinical implications, which need to be confirmed by large-scale, prospective cohort studies and biological mechanism research.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Key Research and Development Program of China
This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit:
- Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geographyNature, 2012
- Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platformsThe ISME Journal, 2012
- Ingestion of Lactobacillus strain regulates emotional behavior and central GABA receptor expression in a mouse via the vagus nerveProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011
- Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanationGenome Biology, 2011
- PrimerProspector: de novo design and taxonomic analysis of barcoded polymerase chain reaction primersBioinformatics, 2011
- Greengenes, a Chimera-Checked 16S rRNA Gene Database and Workbench Compatible with ARBApplied and Environmental Microbiology, 2006
- Diversity of the Human Intestinal Microbial FloraScience, 2005
- Measuring depression outcome with a brief self-report instrument: sensitivity to change of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)Journal of Affective Disorders, 2004
- The PHQ-9Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2001
- Advantages and disadvantages of population screening for cancer and surveillance of at-risk groupsBest Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology, 2001