Psychotherapy for depression among children and adolescents: a systematic review

Authors:
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Objective:  To examine the clinical benefit, the harm and the cost‐effectiveness of psychotherapies in comparison with no treatment, waiting‐list controls, attention‐placebos, and treatment as usual in depressed youths.Method:  Meta‐analyses were undertaken by using data from all relevant randomized‐controlled trials identified by a comprehensive literature search. The primary outcome was relative risk (RR) of response.Results:  We identified 27 studies containing 35 comparisons and 1744 participants. At post‐treatment, psychotherapy was significantly superior (RR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.18–1.65, P = 0.0001, number‐needed to treat 4.3). There was an evidence of the existence of small study effects, including a publication bias (P < 0.001). The superiority of psychotherapy was no longer statistically significant (1.18 [0.94–1.47], P = 0.15) at 6‐month follow‐up. None of the studies reported adverse effects or cost‐effectiveness outcomes.Conclusion:  Although the findings were biased by some small positive trials, psychotherapies appear to help depressed youths for the short term, but are no longer significantly favourable at 6‐month follow‐up.

This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit: