Sex-Based Differences in Core Symptoms of Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Female Presentation
Open Access
- 1 January 2026
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Fundacion Universitaria Maria Cano in Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud
- Vol. 8 (2) , 1-34
Abstract
Introduction. Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is more frequently diagnosed in males; however, evidence suggests that this disparity may partly reflect sex-related biases in diagnostic criteria and assessment tools. Aim. To characterize core ASD symptoms in females across the two DSM-5 diagnostic domains (Social Communication and Interaction, and Restricted and Repetitive Behaviors) and to quantify sex-based differences in symptom severity using standardized diagnostic instruments. Methodology. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. We included studies published between January 2013 and September 2025 that reported on diagnostic processes or symptom presentation and were identified through searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science. Results. Forty-eight studies were included in the qualitative narrative synthesis and seven in the meta-analyses, covering a total of 54,060 participants. Qualitative findings suggested inconsistent sex differences in social communication (DSM-5 Criterion A), whereas more domain-specific patterns emerged for restricted and repetitive behaviors (DSM-5 Criterion B), especially in sensory reactivity and restricted interests. Meta-analyses showed small but significant differences in overall ADOS-2 scores (d = −0.18; 95% CI [−0.35, −0.01]; p = 0.043) and the Social Affect domain (d = −0.23; 95% CI [−0.45, −0.02]; p = 0.033), with lower severity in females. No significant differences (d = −0.12; 95% CI [−0.39, 0.15]; p = 0.393) were found in the Restricted and Repetitive Behavior domain, but we observed high heterogeneity (I2 = 64.7%). Publication bias analyses suggested some funnel-plot asymmetry, although the overall interpretation of the findings remained unchanged. Conclusion. These results highlight the need for sex-informed diagnostic approaches that incorporate comprehensive clinical assessments to enhance early detection and reduce diagnostic delays in females with ASD.Keywords
This publication has 79 references indexed in Scilit:
- Exclusion of females in autism research: Empirical evidence for a “leaky” recruitment‐to‐research pipelineAutism Research, 2022
- Global prevalence of autism: A systematic review updateAutism Research, 2022
- Autism spectrum disorder in a rural community in Bangladesh: A mid‐childhood assessmentAutism Research, 2021
- Camouflaging in Autism: Examining Sex‐Based and Compensatory Models in Social Cognition and CommunicationAutism Research, 2020
- Sex Differences in Social Participation of High School Students with Autism Spectrum DisorderAutism Research, 2020
- Differences in Developmental Functioning Profiles Between Male and Female Preschoolers Children With Autism Spectrum DisorderAutism Research, 2020
- Exploring Social Subtypes in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Preliminary StudyAutism Research, 2020
- ASD symptoms in toddlers and preschoolers: An examination of sex differencesAutism Research, 2019
- Sex differences in parent‐reported executive functioning and adaptive behavior in children and young adults with autism spectrum disorderAutism Research, 2017
- Executive functioning in men and women with an autism spectrum disorderAutism Research, 2016