Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Reduces Failure of Hamstring Tendon Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: 2-Year Outcomes From the STABILITY Study Randomized Clinical Trial
Authors:
- Davide BardanaDavide Bardana
- the STABILITY Study GroupTGthe STABILITY Study Group
Top Cited Papers
- 15 January 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in The American Journal of Sports Medicine
- Vol. 48 (2) , 285-297
Abstract
Persistent anterolateral rotatory laxity after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) has been correlated with poor clinical outcomes and graft failure. We hypothesized that a single-bundle, hamstring ACLR in combination with a lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) would reduce the risk of ACLR failure in young, active individuals. Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing a single-bundle, hamstring tendon ACLR with or without LET performed using a strip of iliotibial band. Patients 25 years or younger with an ACL-deficient knee were included and also had to meet at least 2 of the following 3 criteria: (1) grade 2 pivot shift or greater, (2) a desire to return to high-risk/pivoting sports, (3) and generalized ligamentous laxity (GLL). The primary outcome was ACLR clinical failure, a composite measure of rotatory laxity or a graft rupture. Secondary outcome measures included the P4 pain scale, Marx Activity Rating Scale, Knee injury Osteoarthritis and Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee score, and ACL Quality of Life Questionnaire. Patients were reviewed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. A total of 618 patients (297 males; 48%) with a mean age of 18.9 years (range, 14-25 years) were randomized. A total of 436 (87.9%) patients presented preoperatively with high-grade rotatory laxity (grade 2 pivot shift or greater), and 215 (42.1%) were diagnosed as having GLL. There were 18 patients lost to follow-up and 11 who withdrew (~5%). In the ACLR group, 120/298 (40%) patients sustained the primary outcome of clinical failure, compared with 72/291 (25%) in the ACLR+LET group (relative risk reduction [RRR], 0.38; 95% CI, 0.21-0.52; P < .0001). A total of 45 patients experienced graft rupture, 34/298 (11%) in the ACLR group compared with 11/291 (4%) in the ACL+LET group (RRR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.36-0.83; P < .001). The number needed to treat with LET to prevent 1 patient from graft rupture was 14.3 over the first 2 postoperative years. At 3 months, patients in the ACLR group had less pain as measured by the P4 (P = .003) and KOOS (P = .007), with KOOS pain persisting in favor of the ACLR group to 6 months (P = .02). No clinically important differences in patient-reported outcome measures were found between groups at other time points. The level of sports activity was similar between groups at 2 years after surgery, as measured by the Marx Activity Rating Scale (P = .11). The addition of LET to a single-bundle hamstring tendon autograft ACLR in young patients at high risk of failure results in a statistically significant, clinically relevant reduction in graft rupture and persistent rotatory laxity at 2 years after surgery. NCT02018354 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier)Keywords
Funding Information
- International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
This publication has 60 references indexed in Scilit:
- Anatomy of the anterolateral ligament of the kneeJournal of Anatomy, 2013
- Incidence and Outcome After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2012
- Single‐Bundle Versus Double‐Bundle Reconstruction for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture: A Meta‐Analysis—Does Anatomy Matter?Arthroscopy, 2012
- Computer-assisted anatomically placed double-bundle ACL reconstruction: An in vitro experiment with different tension angles for the AM and the PL graftMedical Engineering & Physics, 2011
- Anatomical single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructionCurrent Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2011
- Return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the state of playBritish Journal of Sports Medicine, 2011
- Long-Term Follow-Up of 24.5 Years After Intra-Articular Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Lateral Extra-Articular AugmentationThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2010
- Validating Self-Report Measures of Pain and Function in Patients Undergoing Hip or Knee ArthroplastyPhysiotherapy Canada, 2009
- Activity Level and Graft Type as Risk Factors for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft FailureThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2009
- Anatomical Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionSports Medicine, 2006