Does Femoral Nerve Catheter Placement with Stimulating Catheters Improve Effective Placement? A Randomized, Controlled, and Observer-Blinded Trial
Authors:
- Astrid M MorinAMAstrid M Morin
- Leopold H J EberhartLELeopold H J Eberhart
- Hagen K E BehnkeHBHagen K E Behnke
- Stefanie WagnerSWStefanie Wagner
- Tilo KochTKTilo Koch
- Udo WolfUWUdo Wolf
- Walter NauWNWalter Nau
- Clemens KillCKClemens Kill
- Götz GeldnerGGGötz Geldner
- Hinnerk WulfHWHinnerk Wulf
- 1 May 2005
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Vol. 100 (5) , 1503-1510
Abstract
Continuous peripheral nerve blocks offer the benefit of extended postoperative analgesia and accelerated functional recovery after major knee surgery. Conventional nerve localization is performed over a stimulating needle followed by blind insertion of the peripheral catheter. Correct catheter placement is confirmed by testing for satisfactory analgesia. Stimulating catheters offer the advantage of verifying correct placement close to the nerve during catheter placement. The aim of this randomized trial was to determine whether accurate catheter positioning under continuous stimulation accelerates the onset of sensory and motor block, improves the quality of postoperative analgesia, and enhances functional recovery. We compared femoral nerve catheters inserted under continuous stimulation with catheters that were placed using the conventional technique of blind advancement in 81 patients undergoing major knee surgery. Time of catheter placement was similar in both groups with 4 min (3/7.3; median, 25th/75th percentile) in the conventional group and 5 min (4/8.8) in the stimulating catheter group. In both groups, 42% of the catheters could be correctly placed (motor response of the patella with a current < or =0.5 mA) at first attempt. In 22 patients (58%) of the stimulating catheter group, the catheter had to be redirected 1-20 times, including 2 that could not be correctly placed within 20 min. The onset time of sensory and motor block was almost similar in both groups. There were no differences in the postoperative IV opioid consumption, and visual analog scale pain scores at rest and movement, or maximal bending and stretching of the knee joint during the 5 days after surgery. We conclude that with continuous femoral nerve blocks, blind catheter advancement is as effective as the stimulating catheter technique with respect to onset time of sensory and motor block as well as for postoperative pain reduction and functional outcome.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reply to Dr. ChellyRegional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, 2003
- Are Nonstimulating Catheters Really Inappropriate For Continuous Nerve Block Techniques?Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, 2003
- Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks With Stimulating CathetersRegional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, 2003
- Continuous Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Postoperative AnalgesiaAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2003
- Continuous Three-in-One Block for Postoperative Pain After Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgery: Where Do the Catheters Go?Anesthesia & Analgesia, 2002
- Continuous Peripheral Nerve Block for Ambulatory SurgeryRegional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, 2001
- Extended “Three-in-One” Block After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Continuous Versus Patient-Controlled TechniquesAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2000
- Modified Continuous Femoral Three-in-One Block for Postoperative Pain After Total Knee ArthroplastyAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1999
- Effects of Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia with Morphine, Continuous Epidural Analgesia, and Continuous Three-in-One Block on Postoperative Pain and Knee Rehabilitation After Unilateral Total Knee ArthroplastyAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1998
- Ultrasonographic Guidance Improves Sensory Block and Onset Time of Three-in-One BlocksAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1997