Impact of Completing CLEFT-Q Scales That Ask About Appearance on Children and Young Adults: An International Study
- 12 February 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in The Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal
- Vol. 57 (7) , 840-848
Abstract
Objective: To describe the impact of completing the CLEFT-Q appearance scales on patients with cleft lip and/or palate and to identify demographic and clinical characteristics and CLEFT-Q scores associated with reporting a negative impact. Design: International cross-sectional survey. Setting: Recruitment took place between October 2014 and November 2016 at 30 craniofacial clinics located in 12 countries. Patients: Aged 8 to 29 years with cleft lip and/or palate. Main Outcome Measure(s): Participants were asked 4 questions to evaluate the impact of completing the field test version of a patient-reported outcome measure (the CLEFT-Q) that included 154 items, of which 79 (51%) asked about appearance (of the face, nose, nostrils, teeth, lips, jaws, and cleft lip scar). Results: The sample included 2056 participants. Most participants liked answering the CLEFT-Q (88%) and the appearance questions (82%). After completing the appearance scales, most participants (77%) did not feel upset or unhappy about how they look, and they felt the same (67%) or better (23%) about their appearance after completing the questionnaire. Demographic and clinical variables associated with feeling unhappy/upset or worse about how they look included country of residence, female gender, more severe cleft, anticipating future cleft-specific surgeries, and reporting lower (ie, worse) scores on CLEFT-Q appearance and health-related quality-of-life scales. Conclusion: Most participants liked completing the CLEFT-Q, but a small minority reported a negative impact. When used in clinical practice, CLEFT-Q scale scores should be examined as soon as possible after completion in order that the clinical team might identify patients who might require additional support.Keywords
Funding Information
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Computerised adaptive testing accurately predicts CLEFT-Q scores by selecting fewer, more patient-focused questionsJournal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2019
- Translation and cultural adaptation of the CLEFT-Q into Arabic, Dutch, Hindi, Swedish, and TurkishEuropean Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2018
- Psychometric findings and normative values for the CLEFT-Q based on 2434 children and young adult patients with cleft lip and/or palate from 12 countriesCanadian Medical Association Journal, 2018
- COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi studyQuality of Life Research, 2018
- Translation and cultural adaptation of the CLEFT-Q for use in Colombia, Chile, and SpainHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2017
- Establishing Content Validity of the CLEFT-Q: A New Patient-reported Outcome Instrument for Cleft Lip/PalatePlastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open, 2017
- International multiphase mixed methods study protocol to develop a cross-cultural patient-reported outcome instrument for children and young adults with cleft lip and/or palate (CLEFT-Q)BMJ Open, 2017
- Updating the Epidemiology of Cleft Lip with or without Cleft PalatePlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2012
- Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics supportJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2009
- The Management of Cleft Lip and Palate: Pathways for Treatment and Longitudinal AssessmentSeminars in Plastic Surgery, 2005