Novel approaches to improve prostate cancer diagnosis and management in early‐stage disease
Open Access
- 19 January 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in BJU International
- Vol. 109 (s2) , 1-7
Abstract
The reported incidence of prostate cancer has risen since the implementation of screening. It is felt that the introduction of widespread prostate‐specific antigen testing is responsible for most patients with prostate cancer now being diagnosed with asymptomatic, clinically localised disease. Diagnosis at this stage is associated with significantly improved treatment outcomes and longer life expectancy. Although there is evidence that screening has reduced prostate cancer mortality, there is a risk of over‐diagnosis and over‐treatment of early state prostate cancers, including clinically insignificant and indolent cancers. Active surveillance and focal therapy have been advocated as potential management options for some patients. However, these approaches face several challenges. Biopsy sampling errors together with less than optimal imaging of tumours can lead to difficulties in selecting suitable low‐risk patients for these options. To overcome these challenges, novel approaches to the staging and monitoring of patients with early prostate cancer are being developed. These include new imaging techniques, such as multi‐parametric magnetic resonance imaging, and the development of new biomarkers and biopsy‐based methods. These techniques aim to assess the potential of a specific tumour to be aggressive, and to improve patient outcomes. The aim of the present paper is to summarise presentations and debates at the third annual Interactive Genitourinary Cancer Conference concerning the use of population‐based screening methods and the roles of active surveillance and focal therapy as prostate cancer treatments. The application of novel imaging biopsy‐based methods and biomarkers in early‐stage prostate cancer will also be explored.Keywords
This publication has 52 references indexed in Scilit:
- Delay of Surgery in Men With Low Risk Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 2011
- Focal Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Phase I/II TrialJournal of Urology, 2011
- Prostate Specific Antigen Velocity Does Not Aid Prostate Cancer Detection in Men With Prior Negative BiopsyJournal of Urology, 2010
- Estimates of cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2008European Journal of Cancer, 2010
- Prostate Cancer–Specific Mortality After Radical Prostatectomy for Patients Treated in the Prostate-Specific Antigen EraJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2009
- Pretreatment Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Velocity and Doubling Time Are Associated With Outcome but Neither Improves Prediction of Outcome Beyond Pretreatment PSA Alone in Patients Treated With Radical ProstatectomyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2009
- Mortality Results from a Randomized Prostate-Cancer Screening TrialNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Screening and Prostate-Cancer Mortality in a Randomized European StudyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Systematic Review of Pretreatment Prostate-Specific Antigen Velocity and Doubling Time As Predictors for Prostate CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2009
- Long-Term Prediction of Prostate Cancer: Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Velocity Is Predictive but Does Not Improve the Predictive Accuracy of a Single PSA Measurement 15 Years or More Before Cancer Diagnosis in a Large, Representative, Unscreened PopulationJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2008