A pilot study investigating the effect of the BEGIN psychoeducation intervention for people at clinical high risk for psychosis on emotional and stigma‐related experiences
- 30 July 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Early Intervention in Psychiatry
- Vol. 18 (12) , 1055-1061
Abstract
Aim: There is concern that the provision of the clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR) label is stigmatizing. Prior research suggests people have nuanced reactions to feedback involving the CHR label, including a positive experience receiving feedback and improvement in negative emotions (e.g., shame), while also exhibiting concerns about self‐perception and perceptions from others related to the label. The current pilot study aimed to evaluate whether individuals at CHR showed changes in emotional and stigma‐related experiences following a CHR psychoeducation intervention, BEGIN: Brief Educational Guide for Individuals in Need.Method: Participants at CHR (N = 26) identified via the Structured Interview for Psychosis‐Risk Syndromes completed the Mental Health Attitudes Interview measuring symptom‐related and CHR label‐related stigma at pre‐ and post‐intervention.Results: Stigma did not increase and participants had greater positive emotions (e.g., feeling hopeful and relieved), post‐BEGIN.Conclusion: This study suggests that standardized CHR psychoeducation does not increase stigma in individuals at CHR.Keywords
Funding Information
- Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance (UL1TR004419)
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Psychoeducation for individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis: A scoping reviewSchizophrenia Research, 2023
- Emotional and stigma-related experiences relative to being told one is at risk for psychosisSchizophrenia Research, 2021
- Should we be concerned about stigma and discrimination in people at risk for psychosis? A systematic reviewPsychological Medicine, 2020
- Impact of “psychosis risk” identification: Examining predictors of how youth view themselvesSchizophrenia Research, 2019
- Interventions to reduce stigma towards people with severe mental illness: Systematic review and meta-analysisJournal of Psychiatric Research, 2018
- Ethical and Epidemiological Dimensions of Labeling Psychosis RiskAMA Journal of Ethics, 2016
- Stigma related to labels and symptoms in individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosisSchizophrenia Research, 2015
- Towards a Cultural Adaptation of Family Psychoeducation: Findings from Three Latino Focus GroupsCommunity Mental Health Journal, 2012
- Potential stigma associated with inclusion of the psychosis risk syndrome in the DSM-V: An empirical questionSchizophrenia Research, 2010
- Neuropsychology of the Prodrome to Psychosis in the NAPLS ConsortiumRelationship to Family History and Conversion to PsychosisNeuropsychology of Prodrome to PsychosisArchives of General Psychiatry, 2010