The Use of Mixed Effects Models for Obtaining Low-Cost Ecosystem Carbon Stock Estimates in Mangroves of the Asia-Pacific
Authors:
Open Access
- 9 January 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 12 (1) , e0169096
Abstract
Mangroves provide extensive ecosystem services that support local livelihoods and international environmental goals, including coastal protection, biodiversity conservation and the sequestration of carbon (C). While voluntary C market projects seeking to preserve and enhance forest C stocks offer a potential means of generating finance for mangrove conservation, their implementation faces barriers due to the high costs of quantifying C stocks through field inventories. To streamline C quantification in mangrove conservation projects, we develop predictive models for (i) biomass-based C stocks, and (ii) soil-based C stocks for the mangroves of the Asia-Pacific. We compile datasets of mangrove biomass C (197 observations from 48 sites) and soil organic C (99 observations from 27 sites) to parameterize the predictive models, and use linear mixed effect models to model the expected C as a function of stand attributes. The most parsimonious biomass model predicts total biomass C stocks as a function of both basal area and the interaction between latitude and basal area, whereas the most parsimonious soil C model predicts soil C stocks as a function of the logarithmic transformations of both latitude and basal area. Random effects are specified by site for both models, which are found to explain a substantial proportion of variance within the estimation datasets and indicate significant heterogeneity across-sites within the region. The root mean square error (RMSE) of the biomass C model is approximated at 24.6 Mg/ha (18.4% of mean biomass C in the dataset), whereas the RMSE of the soil C model is estimated at 4.9 mg C/cm3 (14.1% of mean soil C). The results point to a need for standardization of forest metrics to facilitate meta-analyses, as well as provide important considerations for refining ecosystem C stock models in mangroves.Keywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Detecting landscape-level changes in tree biomass and biodiversity: methodological constraints and challenges of plot-based approachesCanadian Journal of Forest Research, 2013
- A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed‐effects modelsMethods in Ecology and Evolution, 2012
- Estimating Global “Blue Carbon” Emissions from Conversion and Degradation of Vegetated Coastal EcosystemsPLOS ONE, 2012
- Global economic potential for reducing carbon dioxide emissions from mangrove lossProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012
- Opportunities and Challenges for Ecological Restoration within REDD+Restoration Ecology, 2011
- Mangroves among the most carbon-rich forests in the tropicsNature Geoscience, 2011
- The Loss of Species: Mangrove Extinction Risk and Geographic Areas of Global ConcernPLOS ONE, 2010
- Estimating Uncertainty in Ecosystem Budget CalculationsEcosystems, 2010
- Mangroves protected villages and reduced death toll during Indian super cycloneProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009
- Mangrove Ecology, Silviculture and ConservationJournal of Range Management, 2004