Muscle synergy analysis yields an efficient and physiologically relevant method of assessing stroke
Authors:
Open Access
- 9 August 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Brain Communications
- Vol. 4 (4) , fcac200
Abstract
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment is widely used to test motor function in stroke survivors. In the Fugl-Meyer Assessment, stroke survivors perform several movement tasks and clinicians subjectively rate the performance of each task item. The individual task items in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment are selected on the basis of clinical experience, and their physiological relevance has not yet been evaluated. In the present study, we aimed to objectively rate the performance of task items by measuring the muscle activity of 41 muscles from the upper body while stroke survivors and healthy participants performed 37 Fugl-Meyer Assessment upper extremity task items. We used muscle synergy analysis to compare muscle activity between subjects and found that 13 muscle synergies in the healthy participants (which we defined as standard synergies) were able to reconstruct all of the muscle activity in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment. Among the standard synergies, synergies involving the upper arms, forearms and fingers were activated to varying degrees during different task items. In contrast, synergies involving posterior trunk muscles were activated during all tasks, which suggests the importance of posterior trunk muscle synergies throughout all sequences. Furthermore, we noted the inactivation of posterior trunk muscle synergies in stroke survivors with severe but not mild impairments, suggesting that lower trunk stability and the underlying activity of posterior trunk muscle synergies may have a strong influence on stroke severity and recovery. By comparing the synergies of stroke survivors with standard synergies, we also revealed that some synergies in stroke survivors corresponded to merged standard synergies; the merging rate increased with the impairment of stroke survivors. Moreover, the degrees of severity-dependent changes in the merging rate (the merging rate–severity relationship) were different among different task items. This relationship was significant for 26 task items only and not for the other 11 task items. Because muscle synergy analysis evaluates coordinated muscle activities, this different dependency suggests that these 26 task items are appropriate for evaluating muscle coordination and the extent of its impairment in stroke survivors. Overall, we conclude that the Fugl-Meyer Assessment reflects physiological function and muscle coordination impairment and suggest that it could be performed using a subset of the 37 task items.Keywords
Funding Information
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (26120003, 17H05904, 19H05724, 19H05728)
- Italian Ministry of Health (2019-12370271)
- Italian Ministry of Education
- Institute of Information and Communications Technology (1870101)
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Control of reaching movements by muscle synergy combinationsFrontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 2013
- Microstimulation Activates a Handful of Muscle SynergiesNeuron, 2012
- Muscle synergy patterns as physiological markers of motor cortical damageProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012
- Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Sensorimotor Function After StrokeStroke, 2011
- Merging of Healthy Motor Modules Predicts Reduced Locomotor Performance and Muscle Coordination Complexity Post-StrokeJournal of Neurophysiology, 2010
- Effects of Trunk Restraint Combined With Intensive Task Practice on Poststroke Upper Extremity Reach and Function: A Pilot StudyNeurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 2008
- Development and Validation of a Short Form of the Fugl-Meyer Motor Scale in Patients With StrokeStroke, 2007
- Combinations of muscle synergies in the construction of a natural motor behaviorNature Neuroscience, 2003
- Examining outcome measures in a clinical study of stroke.Stroke, 1990
- A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and researchInternational Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 1981