Magnetic resonance imaging–targeted vs. conventional transrectal ultrasound–guided prostate biopsy: Single-institution, matched cohort comparison
- 1 March 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
- Vol. 33 (3) , 109.e1-109.e6
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quality-of-Life Effects of Prostate-Specific Antigen ScreeningNew England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Radical Prostatectomy versus Observation for Localized Prostate CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Dynamic Contrast-enhanced–magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Intraprostatic Prostate Cancer: Correlation with Radical Prostatectomy SpecimensUrology, 2009
- Critical Appraisal of Prostate-specific Antigen in Prostate Cancer Screening: 20 Years LaterUrology, 2009
- Screening and Prostate-Cancer Mortality in a Randomized European StudyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Is There a Better Way to Biopsy the Prostate? Prospects for a Novel Transrectal Systematic Biopsy ApproachUrology, 2007
- How Good is MRI at Detecting and Characterising Cancer within the Prostate?European Urology, 2006
- Prostate Cancers Scored as Gleason 6 on Prostate Biopsy are Frequently Gleason 7 Tumors at Radical Prostatectomy: Implication on OutcomeJournal of Urology, 2006
- Radical Prostatectomy versus Watchful Waiting in Early Prostate CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Improved Detection of Clinically Significant, Curable Prostate Cancer With Systematic 12-Core BiopsyJournal of Urology, 2004