Assessing need for advance imaging among children with back pain using pain intensity as clinical marker
Open Access
- 30 November 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Children's Orthopaedics
- Vol. 16 (6) , 461-465
Abstract
Introduction: Pediatric back pain evaluation nowadays relies on patient history, physical examination, and plain radiographs to identify underlying pathologies. Constant pain, night pain, radicular pain, and abnormal neurological examination were previously recommended as clinical markers to assess the need for magnetic resonance imaging evaluation. Recent studies have challenged the use of these clinical markers, recommending further studies. This study aimed to assess pain intensity as a predictor of underlying magnetic resonance imaging pathology in children with back pain. Methods: An observational cross-sectional study of pediatric patients between 8 and 17 years with back pain for more than 4 weeks from 2009 to 2021 was conducted. A whole spine magnetic resonance imaging was performed on patients with back pain without an identifiable cause and no prior spine treatment. The numerical rating scale questionnaire was administered to each patient, and answers were divided into three groups: mild (1–3), moderate (4–6), and severe (7–10) numerical rating scale score. Student’s t-test and chi-square analysis were used to correlate differences between continuous and categorical values, respectively. Results: Of 590 patients (70% female and a mean age of 15.25 years), there were 35.1% of patients had a magnetic resonance imaging underlying pathology. No association was found between severe numerical rating scale score and the presence of underlying MRI pathology (p = 0.666). Patients with low or moderate numerical rating scale scores had similar associations to an underlying magnetic resonance imaging pathology as patients with a severe numerical rating scale score (p = 0.256; p = 0.357, respectively). Conclusions: Back pain intensity was not found to be an effective clinical marker for predicting underlying magnetic resonance imaging pathology in pediatric patients with back pain.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Debate on the Proposition that Self-report is the Gold Standard in Assessment of Pediatric Pain IntensityThe Clinical Journal of Pain, 2015
- Evaluation of a Systematic Approach to Pediatric Back PainJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 2015
- Clinically Meaningful Changes in Pain Ratings: Why We Need Special Cut Points in Children and AdolescentsPain Management, 2014
- Imaging Modalities for Low Back Pain in ChildrenJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 2013
- Is the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale a Valid Tool for Assessing Pain Intensity in Children Below 8 Years of Age?The Journal of Pain, 2013
- Validation of the Numerical Rating Scale for Pain Intensity and Unpleasantness in Pediatric Acute Postoperative Pain: Sensitivity to Change Over TimeThe Journal of Pain, 2012
- Numerical rating scale for self‐report of pain intensity in children and adolescents: Recent progress and further questionsEuropean journal of pain, 2009
- Diagnostic Modalities for the Evaluation of Pediatric Back PainJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 2008
- Evaluation of an Algorithmic Approach to Pediatric Back PainJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 2006
- Painful scoliosis: a need for further investigation.BMJ, 1986