Validity and Reliability of the German Vocal Fatigue Index in Adults With Voice Disorders
- 5 August 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Speech Language Hearing Association in Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
- Vol. 67 (8) , 2499-2511
Abstract
Purpose: Vocal fatigue–related symptoms, frequent in patients with voice disorders, are reliably quantifiable with the Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI) in several languages. The main aim of this work was to investigate the content and construct validity of the German Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI-D) by comparison with the German Voice Handicap Index 9 international (VHI9i) and the Vocal Tract Discomfort Scale (VTD). Moreover, the scale and retest reliability were investigated. Method: In a prospective cohort study at two tertiary care hospitals, 93 adults with all types of voice complaints filled out the VFI-D, the VHI-9i, and the VTD. Eighty-one adults ( M age = 53.5 years, SD = 15.7) completed them one time, and additional 12 patients ( M age = 53.8 years, SD = 15.6) did a test–retest, completed them twice at an interval of 1 week. The validity was assessed by Spearman's rho and Mokken scaling and the reliability by a factor analysis and a two-tailed t test. Results: Mokken scaling has proven the VFI-D as one-dimensional questionnaire (one cluster, r = .95). All VFI-D items could be assigned to one of three factors according to principal component and principal axis factor analysis. Although Factor 1 related best to the VHI9i (∅ r s = .76) and Factor 2 to the VTD (∅ r s = .74), Factor 3 correlated moderately with the VHI9i ( r s = .34) and weakly with the VTD ( r s = .25). Results from the first and second VFI-D completion agreed strongly ( t = −1.78, p = .10). Conclusions: In this study, the content and construct validity of the VFI-D were confirmed. Also, both scale reliability with identical factors as those in the original study and retest reliability were verified. The VHI9i and VTD were highly indicative of VFI-D Factors 1 and 2, respectively. No correlation between Factor 3 and the other questionnaires was determined. Future research should evaluate which characteristics are specific to vocal fatigue versus general voice disorder–related symptoms.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Vocal Fatigue in School Teachers and It’s Relation to the Acoustic analysis of VoiceIndian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, 2020
- Prätestung des deutschen Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI-D) – transkulturelle Übersetzung und KreuzvalidierungHNO, 2019
- Restructuring the Vocal Fatigue Index Using Mokken Scaling: Insights Into the Complex Nature of Vocal FatigueJournal of Voice, 2019
- Transcultural Adaptation and Validation of the German Version of the Vocal Tract Discomfort ScaleJournal of Voice, 2017
- Prevalence and Voice Characteristics of Laryngeal Pathology in an Italian Voice Therapy-seeking PopulationJournal of Voice, 2016
- Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI): Development and ValidationJournal of Voice, 2015
- Development and Validation of the Voice Fatigue Handicap Questionnaire (VFHQ): Clinical, Psychometric, and Psychosocial FacetsJournal of Voice, 2015
- Physiological Attributes of Vocal Fatigue and Their Acoustic Effects: A Synthesis of Findings for a Criterion-Based Prevention of Acquired Voice DisordersJournal of Voice, 2010
- Acoustic Measures and Self-reports of Vocal Fatigue by Female TeachersJournal of Voice, 2008
- Current and Emerging Concepts in Muscle Tension Dysphonia: A 30-Month ReviewJournal of Voice, 2005