Working to Move the Transportation Disadvantaged—Challenges for Community-Based Transportation Providers
Open Access
- 20 March 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Urban Science
- Vol. 10 (3) , 169
Abstract
Transportation-disadvantaged (TD) populations, including many older adults and people with disabilities, often face mobility barriers linked to fragmented transportation services, limited information about available ride options, and weak coordination across providers. While One-Call/One-Click (1C1C) systems have emerged as solutions to centralize transportation information, support trip planning, and coordinate services across public, nonprofit, and private actors, their capacity to scale remains limited. Using a mixed-methods design, this study examined the institutional arrangements, functional scope, and service scale of 67 operational 1C1C systems to identify systemic barriers to expanding coordinated service access. Quantitative analysis revealed substantial variation in governance, service configurations, costs, and coverage relative to conservative population-based benchmarks, with most systems operating at limited scale. Qualitative interviews with system administrators provide explanatory insight into these patterns, identifying three recurring institutional constraints: funding instability, limited capacity for technology and data integration, and shallow vendor networks for specialized transportation services. The findings indicate that limits to 1C1C performance are rooted in institutional and financial conditions rather than system design. Situating coordinated transportation within the Age-Friendly Cities framework, the study argues that mobility coordination must be treated as durable public infrastructure if equitable, age-friendly mobility is to be achieved at scale.Keywords
Funding Information
- United States federal American Rescue Plan Act
- Ride Connect Texas (GFW40308)
This publication has 67 references indexed in Scilit:
- Data-driven Technology, Organizational Structure, and Interdepartmental Data Sharing: The Case of Government-led Digital Projects in GuangzhouChinese Political Science Review, 2024
- Transportation challenges for persons aging with mobility disability: Qualitative insights and policy implicationsDisability and Health Journal, 2022
- Ten questions concerning age-friendly cities and communities and the built environmentBuilding and Environment, 2021
- Policy capacities and effective policy design: a reviewPolicy Sciences, 2021
- “Creative Financing”: Funding Evidence-Based Interventions in Human Service SystemsThe Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 2018
- Age‐Friendly Initiatives, Social Inequalities, and Spatial JusticeHastings Center Report, 2018
- Public transportation objectives and rider demographics: are transit’s priorities poor public policy?Transportation, 2014
- Towards Global Age-Friendly Cities: Determining Urban Features that Promote Active AgingJournal of Urban Health, 2010
- Profiling Capacity for Coordination and Systems Change: The Relative Contribution of Stakeholder Relationships in Interorganizational CollaborativesAmerican Journal of Community Psychology, 2009
- Demand responsive transport: towards the emergence of a new market segmentJournal of Transport Geography, 2004