Clinicopathologic Analysis of 43 Surgically Resected Lactotroph Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors Stratified by Surgical Indication
Authors:
- Noriaki TanabeNTNoriaki Tanabe
- Naoko InoshitaNINaoko Inoshita
- Go MatsuokaGMGo Matsuoka
- Atsushi IshidaAIAtsushi Ishida
- Masataka KatoMKMasataka Kato
- Haruko YoshimotoHYHaruko Yoshimoto
- Hideki ShiramizuHSHideki Shiramizu
- Hidetaka SugaHSHidetaka Suga
- Toru TatenoTTToru Tateno
- Terushige ToyookaTTTerushige Toyooka
- Kenichi OhashiKOKenichi Ohashi
- 7 July 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in American Journal of Surgical Pathology
- Vol. 50 (9) , 1097-1105
Abstract
Male lactotroph pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) are often considered more aggressive than those in women, but surgically treated cohorts are highly selected and may reflect differences in presentation and indication for surgery. We examined whether advanced clinical presentation in surgically treated lactotroph PitNETs is accompanied by distinct pathologic features. We reviewed 43 patients who underwent surgery for lactotroph PitNETs between 2018 and 2023 at a high-volume referral center. Cases were classified by surgical indication as preference for surgery/intolerance to dopamine agonists (P/I, n=26), resistance with hormonal symptoms (R/H, n=10), and resistance with mass effect (R/M, n=7). Clinical, radiologic, and pathologic parameters, including Ki-67, cytokeratin (CAM5.2), estrogen receptor, somatostatin receptor 2/5, and O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase, were compared. Postoperative endocrinological remission was assessed at the last follow-up (median: 34 mo). All tumors were prolactin-immunoreactive, confirming lactotroph differentiation. Patients in the R/M group were older (median: 56 y), predominantly male (71.4%), and had larger tumors (median: 26 mm) with more frequent cavernous sinus invasion (Knosp grade 4, 85.7%) than those in the other groups. Long-term endocrinological remission differed significantly by indication (P/I, 88.5%; R/H, 80.0%; and R/M, 0%). In contrast, Ki-67 labeling index did not differ significantly across groups (P/I, 1.3%; R/H, 1.5%; and R/M, 2.6%; P =0.598), and no clear between-group differences were identified in CAM5.2 pattern, estrogen receptor, somatostatin receptor 2/5, or O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase status. These findings suggest that the clinically most advanced surgical cases are not matched by distinct pathologic differences in the markers assessed and that the apparent aggressiveness of male-predominant mass-effect cases should not be interpreted solely as reflecting intrinsically aggressive tumor biology.Keywords
Funding Information
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Number 19K07427))
- MHLW Program for Research on Rare and Intractable Diseases (JPMH23FC1042)
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Efficacy of temozolomide combined with capecitabine (CAPTEM) on refractory prolactinomas as assessed using an ex vivo 3D spheroid assayPituitary, 2021
- Surgical outcomes of medically failed prolactinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysisPituitary, 2021
- Prolactinomas in males: any differences?Pituitary, 2019
- Pathology of prolactinomas: any predictive value?Pituitary, 2019
- Hyperprolactinemia diagnosis in elderly men: a cohort of 28 patients over 65 yearsEndocrine, 2019
- Treatment of multiresistant prolactinomas with a combination of cabergoline and octreotide LAREndocrine, 2018
- Diagnosis and Treatment of Pituitary AdenomasJAMA, 2017
- Clinical and histological correlations in prolactinomas, with special reference to bromocriptine resistanceActa Neurochirurgica, 2005
- Growth potential of prolactinomas in men: is it really different from women?Surgical Neurology, 2003
- Gender-related differences in prolactin secretion in pituitary prolactinomasNeuroradiology, 2002