Fringe Projection Profilometry in Production Metrology: A Multi-Scale Comparison in Sheet-Bulk Metal Forming
Authors:
- Lennart HinzLHLennart Hinz
- Sebastian MetznerSMSebastian Metzner
- Philipp MüllerPMPhilipp Müller
- Robert SchulteRSRobert Schulte
- Hans-Bernward BessererHBHans-Bernward Besserer
- Steffen WackenrohrSWSteffen Wackenrohr
- Christopher SauerChristopher Sauer
- Markus KästnerMarkus Kästner
- Tino HausotteTHTino Hausotte
- Sven HübnerSHSven Hübner
- Florian NürnbergerFNFlorian Nürnberger
- Benjamin SchleichBSBenjamin Schleich
Open Access
Abstract
Fringe projection profilometry in combination with other optical measuring technologies has established itself over the last decades as an essential complement to conventional, tactile measuring devices. The non-contact, holistic reconstruction of complex geometries within fractions of a second in conjunction with the lightweight and transportable sensor design open up many fields of application in production metrology. Furthermore, triangulation-based measuring principles feature good scalability, which has led to 3D scanners for various scale ranges. Innovative and modern production processes, such as sheet-bulk metal forming, thus, utilize fringe projection profilometry in many respects to monitor the process, quantify possible wear and improve production technology. Therefore, it is essential to identify the appropriate 3D scanner for each application and to properly evaluate the acquired data. Through precise knowledge of the measurement volume and the relative uncertainty with respect to the specimen and scanner position, adapted measurement strategies and integrated production concepts can be realized. Although there are extensive industrial standards and guidelines for the quantification of sensor performance, evaluation and tolerancing is mainly global and can, therefore, neither provide assistance in the correct, application-specific positioning and alignment of the sensor nor reflect the local characteristics within the measuring volume. Therefore, this article compares fringe projection systems across various scale ranges by positioning and scanning a calibrated sphere in a high resolution grid.Keywords
Funding Information
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (68237143)
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Holistic Measurement in the Sheet-Bulk Metal Forming Process with Fringe ProjectionKey Engineering Materials, 2012
- Algorithms for Generating Adaptive Projection Patterns for 3D Shape MeasurementJournal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 2008
- Pattern codification strategies in structured light systemsPattern Recognition, 2004
- A flexible new technique for camera calibrationIEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2000
- A method for registration of 3-D shapesIEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1992
- Influence of Gear Tooth Geometry on Tooth Stress of External and Internal GearsJournal of Mechanical Design, 1990
- A solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectorsActa Crystallographica Section A, 1976
- Multidimensional binary search trees used for associative searchingCommunications of the ACM, 1975
- Choosing a Point from the Surface of a SphereThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1972
- Rational formulae for the production of a spherically symmetric probability distributionMathematics of Computation, 1957