Implementation of a data-driven quality improvement program in primary care for patients with coronary heart disease: a mixed methods evaluation of acceptability, satisfaction, barriers and enablers
Open Access
- 14 January 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by CSIRO Publishing in Australian Journal of Primary Health
- Vol. 31 (1)
Abstract
Background: The study aimed to understand the acceptability, satisfaction, uptake, utility and feasibility of a quality improvement (QI) intervention to improve care for coronary heart disease (CHD) patients in Australian primary care practices and identify barriers and enablers, including the impact of COVID-19. Methods: Within the QUality improvement for Effectiveness of care for people Living with heart disease (QUEL) study, 26 Australian primary care practices, supported by five Primary Health Networks (PHN) participated in a 1-year QI intervention (November 2019 – November 2020). Data were collected from practices and PHNs staff via surveys and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed with descriptive statistics and thematic analysis, respectively. Results: Feedback was received from 64 participants, including practice team members and PHN staff. Surveys were completed after each of six workshops and at the end of the study. Interviews were conducted with a subgroup of participants (n = 9). Participants reported positive satisfaction with individual QI features such as learning workshops and monthly feedback reports. Overall, the intervention was well-received, with most participants expressing interest in participating in similar programs in the future. COVID-19 and lack of time were identified as common barriers, whereas team collaboration and effective leadership enabled practices’ participation in the QI program. Additionally, 90% of the practices reported COVID-19 effected their participation due to vaccination rollout, telehealth set-up, and continuous operational review shifting their focus from QI. Conclusion: Data-driven QI programs in primary care can boost practice staff confidence and foster increased implementation. Barriers and enablers identified can also support other practices in prioritising effective strategies for future implementation.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Health and Medical Research Council (GNT1140807)
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiovascular disease prevention and managementNature Medicine, 2023
- Data-driven quality improvement program to prevent hospitalisation and improve care of people living with coronary heart disease: Protocol for a process evaluationContemporary Clinical Trials, 2022
- A quality improvement collaborative to build improvement capacity in regional primary care support organisationsBMJ Open Quality, 2019
- Evolving quality improvement support strategies to improve Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle fidelity: a retrospective mixed-methods studyBMJ Quality & Safety, 2019
- Impacts of continuous quality improvement in Aboriginal and Torres Strait islander primary health care in AustraliaJournal of Health Organization and Management, 2018
- Building capacity for continuous quality improvement (CQI): A pilot studyJournal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 2017
- Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidanceBMJ, 2015
- Consistency of denominator data in electronic health records in Australian primary healthcare services: enhancing data qualityAustralian Journal of Primary Health, 2015
- Regular Primary Care Plays a Significant Role in Secondary Prevention of Ischemic Heart Disease in a Western Australian CohortJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2011
- What is "quality improvement" and how can it transform healthcare?Quality and Safety in Health Care, 2007