Differential diagnosis of atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma and dedifferentiated liposarcoma: utility of p16 in combination with MDM2 and CDK4 immunohistochemistry
- 1 January 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Human Pathology
- Vol. 59, 34-40
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- The CDKN2A/CDKN2B/CDK4/CCND1 pathway is pivotal in well‐differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcoma oncogenesis. An analysis of 104 tumorsGenes, Chromosomes and Cancer, 2011
- Can MDM2 analytical tests performed on core needle biopsy be relied upon to diagnose well-differentiated liposarcoma?Laboratory Investigation, 2010
- Molecular Testing for Lipomatous Tumors: Critical Analysis and Test Recommendations Based on the Analysis of 405 Extremity-based TumorsAmerican Journal of Surgical Pathology, 2010
- Can MDM2 and CDK4 make the diagnosis of well differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma? An immunohistochemical study on 129 soft tissue tumoursJournal of Clinical Pathology, 2009
- Clinical and Biological Significance of CDK4 Amplification in Well-Differentiated and Dedifferentiated LiposarcomasClinical Cancer Research, 2009
- Fluorescence in situ hybridization for MDM2 gene amplification as a diagnostic tool in lipomatous neoplasmsLaboratory Investigation, 2008
- HMGA2 is the partner of MDM2 in well‐differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcomas whereas CDK4 belongs to a distinct inconsistent ampliconInternational Journal of Cancer, 2008
- The Regulation of INK4/ARF in Cancer and AgingCell, 2006
- Soft-Tissue Sarcomas in AdultsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- p16INK4a Is a Useful Marker for the Diagnosis of Adenocarcinoma of the Cervix Uteri and Its PrecursorsAmerican Journal of Surgical Pathology, 2003