Quality of maternal and newborn care, perinatal mental health and the emotional birth experience of women: findings of the IMAgiNE EURO study in Belgium
Authors:
- Anna GalleAGAnna Galle
- Ilaria MarianiIMIlaria Mariani
- Marzia LazzeriniMarzia Lazzerini
- IMAGINE GLOBAL STUDY GROUPIGIMAGINE GLOBAL STUDY GROUP
Open Access
Abstract
Objective: This study explored the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) in Belgium, focusing on women’s experience with care and their mental health (MH). Design: We conducted a cross-sectional survey using the WHO-based IMAgiNE EURO questionnaire, updated with MH items. Setting: All women who gave birth in a health facility in Belgium were included. Participants: Data were collected from 621 women who gave birth between March 2022 and January 2025. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Descriptive statistics summarised QMNC and MH outcomes, while logistic regression examined factors associated with negative emotional childbirth experiences. Results: The median QMNC index was 260/300, suggesting high adherence to WHO quality standards. However, 33.5% of respondents reported ineffective communication, 34.0% a lack of involvement in decision-making, 8.7% no emotional support from healthcare providers and 8.2% reported abuse. Overall, 40.9% of women reported emotional difficulties related to childbirth, with 10% reporting a negative impact on well-being. MH screening and support were not structurally embedded in perinatal care. Emergency caesarean deliveries (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 14.94), instrumental births (aOR: 2.36), fundal pressure (aOR: 4.11) and abuse (aOR: 3.74) were significantly associated with emotional difficulties around childbirth. The presence of an obstetric consultant (aOR: 0.44) and higher QMNC scores (aOR: 0.97) were associated with a lower likelihood of reporting emotional difficulties. Conclusions: Belgium shows a high level of QMNC, yet significant gaps remain in communication, MH screening and support and adherence to evidence-based practices. Our study highlights a strong association between certain childbirth interventions and a negative emotional birth experience, emphasising the need for further research into the underlying causal patterns and contextual factors shaping women’s childbirth experiences.Keywords
Funding Information
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo” in Trieste (NA)
- Ministero della Salute (NA)
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Can respectful maternity care save and improve lives?Birth, 2019
- Intergenerational transfer of perinatal trauma-related consequencesJournal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 2019
- Fundal pressure in second stage of labor (Kristeller maneuver) is associated with increased risk of levator ani muscle avulsionUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018
- The evolution of birth medicalisation: A systematic reviewMidwifery, 2018
- Continuity of care is an important and distinct aspect of childbirth experience: findings of a survey evaluating experienced continuity of care, experienced quality of care and women’s perception of laborBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2018
- The impact of childbirth-related post-traumatic stress on a couple’s relationship: a systematic review and meta-synthesisJournal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 2017
- Fundal pressure during the second stage of labourCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2017
- Stress-induced perinatal and transgenerational epigenetic programming of brain development and mental healthNeuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 2015
- Continuity of care: what matters to women when they are referred from primary to secondary care during labour? a qualitative interview study in the NetherlandsBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2014
- Outcomes of planned home births and planned hospital births in low-risk women in Norway between 1990 and 2007: A retrospective cohort studySexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 2012