Phenomapping in Patients Experiencing Worsening Renal Function During Hospitalization for Acute Heart Failure
Authors:
- Ryuichiro YagiRYRyuichiro Yagi
- Makoto TakeiMTMakoto Takei
- Shun KohsakaSKShun Kohsaka
- Yasuyuki ShiraishiYSYasuyuki Shiraishi
- Nobuhiro IkemuraNINobuhiro Ikemura
- Satoshi ShojiSSSatoshi Shoji
- Nozomi NiimiNNNozomi Niimi
- Satoshi HiguchiSHSatoshi Higuchi
- Ayumi GodaAGAyumi Goda
- Takashi KohnoTKTakashi Kohno
- Yuji NagatomoYuji Nagatomo
Open Access
- 20 September 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in ESC Heart Failure
- Vol. 8 (6) , 5192-5203
Abstract
Aims The impact of worsening renal function (WRF) on the prognosis of patients with acute heart failure (AHF) remains controversial. We aimed to identify phenotypically distinct subgroups among individuals with both AHF and WRF using cluster analysis. Methods and results Overall, the data of 483 patients with both AHF and WRF enrolled in the West Tokyo Heart Failure Registry were analysed. Using cluster analysis, we identified three phenotypically distinct subgroups (phenogroups 1, 2, and 3). We assessed the impact of WRF on the prognosis of each phenogroup by comparing the incidence of composite endpoints, including all-cause death and re-hospitalization due to heart failure, with those of a propensity score-matched, non-WRF control group. Participants in phenogroup 1 (N = 122) were the youngest (69.3 ± 13.7 years), had relatively preserved estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, 70.0 ± 27.7 mL/min/1.73 m2), and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (41.8 ± 13.7%). Conversely, participants in phenogroup 3 (N = 122) were the oldest (81.7 ± 8.5 years), had the worst eGFR (33.0 ± 20.9 mL/min/1.73 m2), and had preserved LVEF (51.7 ± 14.8%). The characteristics of the participants in phenogroup 2 (N = 239) were between those of phenogroups 1 and 3. The propensity score matching analysis showed that WRF was associated with a higher incidence of composite endpoints in phenogroup 1, whereas this association was not observed in phenogroups 2 and 3. Conclusions Using cluster analysis, we revealed three phenotypically distinct subgroups of patients with both AHF and WRF. WRF was associated with worse clinical outcomes in the subgroup of younger patients with reduced LVEF and preserved renal function.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- The many faces of heart failure with preserved ejection fractionNature Reviews Cardiology, 2012
- Phenotypic and pathophysiological heterogeneity in heart failure with preserved ejection fractionEuropean Heart Journal, 2012
- Renal Dysfunction in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Versus Reduced Ejection FractionCirculation: Heart Failure, 2012
- Incidence, clinical predictors, and prognostic impact of worsening renal function in elderly patients with chronic heart failure on intensive medical therapyAmerican Heart Journal, 2012
- The survival of patients with heart failure with preserved or reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: an individual patient data meta-analysisEuropean Heart Journal, 2011
- Potential Effects of Aggressive Decongestion During the Treatment of Decompensated Heart Failure on Renal Function and SurvivalCirculation, 2010
- Revised Equations for Estimated GFR From Serum Creatinine in JapanAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2009
- Practical recommendations for prehospital and early in-hospital management of patients presenting with acute heart failure syndromesCritical Care Medicine, 2008
- Worsening Renal Function and Prognosis in Heart Failure: Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisJournal of Cardiac Failure, 2007
- Correlates and impact on outcomes of worsening renal function in patients ≥65 years of age with heart failureThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2000