Patient and healthcare professionals’ perception of weekly prophylactic catheter washout in adults living with long-term catheters: qualitative study of the CATHETER II trial
Open Access
Abstract
Objectives To explore trial participants’ experience of long-term catheters (LTC), the acceptability of washout policies, their experience of the CATHETER II trial (a randomised controlled trial comparing the clinical effectiveness of various washout policies versus no washout policy in preventing catheter associated complications in adults living with long-term catheters) and their satisfaction with the outcomes. The objectives of the healthcare professionals (HCPs) focus group and interview were to explore their attitudes towards weekly prophylactic catheter washout, views on the provision of training and participants’ ability to enact washout behaviours. Methodology A longitudinal qualitative study embedded within the CATHETER II randomised controlled trial, which included semi-structured interviews and focus groups with participants from multiple trial sites. Data were analysed using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability and Theoretical Domains Framework. This UK community-based study included 50 (24 female, 26 male) CATHETER II trial participants, aged between 23 and 100 years, with LTC and able to self-manage the washout and study documentation either independently or with the help of a carer. Seven HCPs (five female, two male) also participated. Results The participants had positive attitudes towards weekly prophylactic saline or acidic catheter washouts and other trial elements, such as washout training, catheter calendar and monthly phone calls. Participants and HCPs found the ‘ask’ of the CATHETER II trial and the weekly self-administered prophylactic washout policies to be feasible. The participants reported that the catheter washout training provided during the trial enhanced their self-efficacy, skills and self-reported capability to carry out the washouts. Participants reported having positive outcomes from the weekly washout. These included reduced blockage, pain or infection, reduced need for HCP support and greater psychological reassurance. HCPs attested to the participants’ understanding of and adherence to the weekly washouts and other elements of the trial. Conclusions This study shows acceptability, feasibility and self-reported fidelity of the CATHETER II trial on a behavioural level. Self-management for prophylactic catheter washouts is both feasible and, following training, achievable without any need for additional support. Trial registration number ISRCTN17116445.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme (17/30/02)
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patients’ and Health Care Professionals’ Expectations, Experience, and Perception of the Outcomes of Various Washout Policies in Preventing Catheter-associated Complications: Qualitative Study of the CATHETER II TrialEuropean Urology Focus, 2022
- Epidemiology and health-economic burden of urinary-catheter-associated infection in English NHS hospitals: a probabilistic modelling studyJournal of Hospital Infection, 2019
- Combining the reasoned action approach and habit formation to reduce sitting time in classrooms: Outcome and process evaluation of the Let's Move It teacher interventionJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2019
- Community prevalence of long‐term urinary catheters use in EnglandNeurourology and Urodynamics, 2016
- Which Behavior Change Techniques are Associated with Changes in Physical Activity, Diet and Body Mass Index in People with Recently Diagnosed Diabetes?Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 2014
- Major ingredients of fidelity: A review and scientific guide to improving quality of intervention research implementationClinical Psychology Review, 2011
- Do Catheter Washouts Extend Patency Time in Long-term Indwelling Urethral Catheters?Journal of Wound, Ostomy & Continence Nursing, 2009
- Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groupsInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2007
- Whatever happened to qualitative description?Research in Nursing & Health, 2000
- Once-Daily Irrigation of Long-term Urethral Catheters With Normal SalineArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1989