Covering ileo- or colostomy in anterior resection for rectal carcinoma
- 12 May 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Vol. 2010 (5) , CD006878
Abstract
Anastomotic leakage is one of the most important complications that occur after surgical low anterior resection for rectal cancer. There are indications that anastomotic leak is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, frequent re-operation or radiological drainage, and prolonged hospital stay. Defunctioning stoma can be useful for patients undergoing a rectal surgery. To determine the efficacy of protective defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Searches were conducted November 2009. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (from 1966) and EMBASE (from 1980). We included randomised clinical trials comparing the use of stoma versus "no stoma" in patients that received low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Six randomised controlled trials were identified and included in this review. Five trials were fully published in peer-reviewed journals. An attempt was made to obtain further information from the authors of the trial that was available only in an abstract form. The studies analysed the following outcomes: clinical anastomotic leakage, urgent reoperation, mortality and length of postoperative hospital stay. Review authors extracted the data independently, the risk ratios (RR) were estimated for the dichotomous outcomes and standardised mean difference were estimated for the continuous outcome All the trials reported results for clinical anastomotic leakage, urgent reoperation and mortality. Only two trials reported the results for length of postoperative hospital stay.With respect to controls, use of covering stoma was significantly associated with less anastomotic leakage (RR 0.33; 95%CI [0.21, 0.53]) and less urgent reoperation (RR 0.23; 95%CI [0.12, 0.42] ). There was no significant difference in terms of mortality (RR 0.58; 95%CI [0.14, 2.33]). There was no evidence of statistical heterogeneity in any of the comparisons. Covering stoma seems to be useful to prevent anastomotic leakage and urgent re-operations in patients receiving low anterior resection for rectal cancer. However, covering stoma does not seems to offer advantage in term of 30 days or long term mortality.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Diverting Stoma After Low Anterior ResectionDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2009
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Role of Defunctioning Stoma in Low Rectal Cancer SurgeryAnnals of Surgery, 2008
- Defunctioning Stoma Reduces Symptomatic Anastomotic Leakage After Low Anterior Resection of the Rectum for CancerAnnals of Surgery, 2007
- Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006Annals of Oncology, 2007
- A Defunctioning Ileostomy Does Not Prevent Clinical Anastomotic Leak After a Low Anterior Resection: A Prospective, Comparative StudyDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2005
- Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectumColorectal Disease, 2004
- Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer With Mesorectal ExcisionAnnals of Surgery, 2004
- Anastomotic leakage after curative anterior resection results in a higher prevalence of local recurrenceBritish Journal of Surgery, 2003
- Postoperative morbidity and mortality following resection of the colon and rectum for cancerDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1995
- Anastomotic dehiscence after anterior resection of rectum and sigmoidBritish Journal of Surgery, 1970