Unique characteristics of motor adaptation during walking in young children
Authors:
- Kristin E. MusselmanKMKristin E. Musselman
- Erin V. L. VasudevanEVErin V. L. Vasudevan
- Jaynie F. YangJYJaynie F. Yang
- Wouter HoogkamerWHWouter Hoogkamer
- Sjoerd M. BruijnSBSjoerd M. Bruijn
- Zrinka PotocanacZPZrinka Potocanac
- Frank Van CalenberghFCFrank Van Calenbergh
- Stephan P. SwinnenSSStephan P. Swinnen
- Jacques DuysensJDJacques Duysens
- Tetsuya OgawaTOTetsuya Ogawa
- 1 May 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physiological Society in Journal of Neurophysiology
- Vol. 105 (5) , 2195-2203
Abstract
Children show precocious ability in the learning of languages; is this the case with motor learning? We used split-belt walking to probe motor adaptation (a form of motor learning) in children. Data from 27 children (ages 8–36 mo) were compared with those from 10 adults. Children walked with the treadmill belts at the same speed (tied belt), followed by walking with the belts moving at different speeds (split belt) for 8–10 min, followed again by tied-belt walking (postsplit). Initial asymmetries in temporal coordination (i.e., double support time) induced by split-belt walking were slowly reduced, with most children showing an aftereffect (i.e., asymmetry in the opposite direction to the initial) in the early postsplit period, indicative of learning. In contrast, asymmetries in spatial coordination (i.e., center of oscillation) persisted during split-belt walking and no aftereffect was seen. Step length, a measure of both spatial and temporal coordination, showed intermediate effects. The time course of learning in double support and step length was slower in children than in adults. Moreover, there was a significant negative correlation between the size of the initial asymmetry during early split-belt walking (called error) and the aftereffect for step length. Hence, children may have more difficulty learning when the errors are large. The findings further suggest that the mechanisms controlling temporal and spatial adaptation are different and mature at different times.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Younger Is Not Always Better: Development of Locomotor Adaptation from Childhood to AdulthoodJournal of Neuroscience, 2011
- Seeing Is Believing: Effects of Visual Contextual Cues on Learning and Transfer of Locomotor AdaptationJournal of Neuroscience, 2010
- Error Correction, Sensory Prediction, and Adaptation in Motor ControlAnnual Review of Neuroscience, 2010
- Thinking About Walking: Effects of Conscious Correction Versus Distraction on Locomotor AdaptationJournal of Neurophysiology, 2010
- Size of Error Affects Cerebellar Contributions to Motor LearningJournal of Neurophysiology, 2010
- Walking flexibility after hemispherectomy: split-belt treadmill adaptation and feedback controlBrain, 2008
- Locomotor adaptation on a split-belt treadmill can improve walking symmetry post-strokeBrain, 2007
- Interacting Adaptive Processes with Different Timescales Underlie Short-Term Motor LearningPLOS Biology, 2006
- Interlimb Coordination During Locomotion: What Can be Adapted and Stored?Journal of Neurophysiology, 2005
- Infants Adapt Their Stepping to Repeated Trip-Inducing StimuliJournal of Neurophysiology, 2003