Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Potential of Romanian Propolis Extract Combinations: Linking Chemical Composition with Biological Activity
Authors:
- Alexandru Ioan GiurgiuAGAlexandru Ioan Giurgiu
- Gianluca AlbaneseGAGianluca Albanese
- Adriana Cristina UrcanAUAdriana Cristina Urcan
- Victorița BontaVBVictorița Bonta
- Antonio De CristofaroACAntonio De Cristofaro
- Massimo IorizzoMassimo Iorizzo
- Otilia BobișOtilia Bobiș
- Daniel Severus DezmireanDaniel Severus Dezmirean
Open Access
- 1 October 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Antibiotics
- Vol. 15 (10) , 972
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Propolis is a chemically complex product whose antimicrobial activity varies with geographical origin and composition. This study evaluated the chemical, antioxidant, and antimicrobial properties of five Romanian propolis ethanolic extracts (PEEs) and their combinations, focusing on antimicrobial interactions and chemical–biological relationships. Methods: Five PEEs were evaluated individually, as ten binary combinations, and as one five-extract mixture. Antioxidant activity and 20 phenolic compounds were determined. Antimicrobial activity against 16 strains was assessed using agar diffusion and broth microdilution assays. Extract interactions were evaluated using the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI). Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Spearman correlation, and Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression investigated chemical–biological relationships. Results: Significant differences were observed among preparations in phenolic composition, antioxidant activity, and antimicrobial responses. Total phenolic content ranged from 88.8 to 149.8 mg GAE/g, while A + S showed the highest antioxidant activity (3213.74 mg TE/g). C1 showed strong activity against several Gram-positive bacteria and Candida albicans, whereas S and S-containing combinations showed activity against several Gram-negative strains. FICI analysis showed predominantly indifferent interactions (60.8%), followed by additive (25.0%), synergistic (9.09%), and antagonistic (5.11%). The strongest synergy was observed for A + S against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (FICI = 0.195). Chemical PC1 was inversely associated with biological PC2 (ρ = −0.809, FDR-adjusted p = 0.0013). Conclusions: Antimicrobial activity depends on extract composition and the target microorganism. Combining extracts did not consistently improve activity; however, selected combinations produced additive or synergistic interactions, whereas antagonism was uncommon. Multivariate analyses further supported an association between phenolic composition and antimicrobial variability.Keywords
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- Anti-bacterial Properties of Propolis: A Comprehensive ReviewCurrent Microbiology, 2025
- Propolis and geopropolis from stingless bees as a source of bioactive compounds with antioxidant and antimicrobial action: A reviewFood Research International, 2025
- Propolis: A comprehensive review on the nature's polyphenolic wonderFitoterapia, 2025
- Organoleptic and chemical properties of propolis: a reviewEuropean Food Research and Technology, 2025
- Extension and significance testing of Variable Importance in Projection (VIP) indices in Partial Least Squares regression and Principal Components AnalysisChemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2023
- Recent advances on the stability of dietary polyphenolsEfood, 2022
- Propolis: chemical diversity and challenges in quality controlPhytochemistry Reviews, 2022
- Evaluation of bioactive compounds potential and antioxidant activity of brown, green and red propolis from Brazilian northeast regionFood Research International, 2017
- Phenolic compounds and antioxidant properties of breeding lines between the white and black riceFood Chemistry, 2015
- Influence of postharvest processing and storage on the content of phenolic acids and flavonoids in foodsMolecular Nutrition & Food Research, 2009