Assessing the Effectiveness of 3D-Printed Ceramic Structures for Coral Restoration: Growth, Survivorship, and Biodiversity Using Visual Surveys and eDNA
Authors:
- Vriko YuVriko Yu
- Alison D. CorleyAlison D. Corley
- Horace LauHorace Lau
- Philip D. ThompsonPhilip D. Thompson
- Zhongyue Wilson WanZhongyue Wilson Wan
- Jane C. Y. WongJane C. Y. Wong
- Zoe Kwan Ting WongZoe Kwan Ting Wong
- Louise Wai Hung LiLouise Wai Hung Li
- Shelby E. McIlroyShelby E. McIlroy
- David M. BakerDavid M. Baker
Open Access
- 22 August 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
- Vol. 13 (9) , 1605
Abstract
Coral reef degradation has spurred the development of artificial structures to mitigate losses in coral cover. These structures serve as substrates for coral transplantation, with the expectation that growing corals will attract reef-associated taxa—while the substrate’s ability to directly support biodiversity is often neglected. We evaluated a novel 3D-printed modular tile made of porous terra cotta, designed with complex surface structures to enhance micro- and cryptic biodiversity, through a restoration project in Hong Kong. Over four years, we monitored 378 outplanted coral fragments using diver assessments and photography, while biodiversity changes were assessed through visual surveys and eDNA metabarcoding. Coral survivorship was high, with 88% survival after four years. Visual surveys recorded seven times more fish and almost 60% more invertebrates at the restoration site compared to a nearby unrestored area. eDNA analyses revealed a 23.5% higher eukaryote ASV richness at the restoration site than the unrestored site and 13.3% greater richness relative to a natural reference coral community. This study highlights the tiles’ dual functionality: (1) supporting coral growth and (2) enhancing cryptic biodiversity, an aspect often neglected in traditional reef restoration efforts. Our findings underscore the potential of 3D-printed ceramic structures to improve both coral restoration outcomes and broader reef ecosystem recovery.Keywords
All Related Versions
Funding Information
- Hong Kong Research Grants Council Collaborative Research Fund (C7013-19G, AFCD/SQ/256/18/C, AFCD/SQ/17/22/C)
- Hong Kong Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department (C7013-19G, AFCD/SQ/256/18/C, AFCD/SQ/17/22/C)
This publication has 120 references indexed in Scilit:
- Novel Drop‐Sampler for Simultaneous Collection of Stereo‐Video, Environmental DNA and Oceanographic DataEcology and Evolution, 2024
- A new flow path: eDNA connecting hydrology and biologyWIREs Water, 2024
- Toward quantitative metabarcodingEcology, 2022
- Environmental DNA metabarcoding read numbers and their variability predict species abundance, but weakly in non‐dominant speciesEnvironmental DNA, 2022
- If You Build It, Will They Come? An Environmental DNA Assessment of Fish Assemblages on Artificial Reefs in the Northern Gulf of MexicoTransactions of the American Fisheries Society, 2022
- Maximizing fish detection with eDNA metabarcodingEnvironmental DNA, 2020
- From eDNA to citizen science: emerging tools for the early detection of invasive speciesFrontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2020
- The diversity of benthic diatoms affects ecosystem productivity in heterogeneous coastal environmentsEcology, 2019
- Coral Reef Biodiversity2010
- Artificial structures as tools for fish habitat rehabilitation in a neotropical reservoirAquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 2008