Effects of low and high nutrients on the competitive hierarchy of 26 shoreline plants

Authors:
  • PKPaul Keddy
    Paul Keddy
  • CGConnie Gaudet
    Connie Gaudet
  • LFLauchlan H. Fraser
    Lauchlan H. Fraser
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Summary: 1 We tested the hypothesis that competitive hierarchies are invariant with respect to changing nutrient supply. 2 The competitive performance of 26 shoreline plant species was determined experimentally as the relative ability to suppress the growth of a common indicator (phytometer) species, Penthorum sedoides. Each species was grown with the phytometer under each of two nutrient treatments created with different concentrations of a modified Hoagland’s solution (n = 5 replicates per species/treatment), for two growing seasons. 3 Although shifts in ranking of relative competitive performance were apparent between nutrient levels, competitive performance under high and low nutrient conditions was significantly correlated in both year 1 (r = 0.65) and year 2 (r = 0.76), when all species were considered. 4 At the broad community scale, the outcome of competitive interactions thus appears to be relatively predictable and independent of the environment, and therefore provides a useful tool for exploring and understanding community pattern. These results cannot address questions related to the outcome of competitive interactions between similar species or the effects of fine‐scale pattern.

This publication has 60 references indexed in Scilit: